Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
691 kcal
Score
14 / 100
At least one nutrition score lacks comparable measurements, so no overall winner is assigned.
Energy Diff
884 vs 691(-21.8%)
Score Diff
— vs 14
Higher energy
Çörek Otu Yağı
Score leader
Insufficient data
Nutrient split
3 - 5 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Çörek Otu Yağı and Amerikan cevizi are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Çörek Otu Yağı has 884.0 kcal and Amerikan cevizi has 691.0 kcal. The difference is 193.0 kcal.
There are not enough comparable micronutrient measurements for a score comparison.
8 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Çörek Otu Yağı | Amerikan cevizi | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| ALA (18:3 n-3) | 0.6 g | — | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | — | 0.66 mg | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | — | 0.13 mg | — |
| B6 Vitamini | — | 0.21 mg | — |
| Beta-sitosterol | 265 mg | — | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | — | 1.1 mg | — |
| Demir | — | 2.53 mg | — |
| Diyet lifi | 0 g | 9.6 g | — |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 3.5 mg | — | — |
| Enerji | 3699 kj | — | — |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | 884 kcal | — | — |
| Fitosteroller | 510 mg | — | — |
| Fosfor | — | 277 mg | — |
| Gama tokoferol | 9.8 mg | — | — |
| Kalsiyum | — | 70 mg | — |
| Kampesterol | 72 mg | — | — |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 0 g | 13.86 g | — |
| Kolesterol | 0 mg | — | — |
| Magnezyum | — | 121 mg | — |
| MUFA 18:1 (oleik asit) | 23.8 g | — | — |
| Niasin | — | 1.17 mg | — |
| Potasyum | — | 410 mg | — |
| Protein | 0 g | 9.17 g | — |
| PUFA 18:2 (linoleik asit) | 55.2 g | — | — |
| PUFA 20:2 c | 2.7 g | — | — |
| SFA 16:0 (palmitik asit) | 12.5 g | — | — |
| SFA 18:0 (stearik asit) | 3 g | — | — |
| Su | 0 g | 3.52 g | — |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 15.7 g | 6.18 g | -60.6% |
| Toplam Folat | — | 22 µg | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 24.6 g | 40.8 g | +65.9% |
| Toplam yağ | 100 g | 71.97 g | -28.0% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 58.5 g | 21.6 g | -63.1% |
| Toplam Şeker | — | 3.97 g | — |
| Çinko | — | 4.53 mg | — |
Scientific answers to key differences between Çörek Otu Yağı and Amerikan cevizi.
Amerikan cevizi has less energy per 100 g (691 kcal versus 884 kcal).
For measured Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri, Çörek Otu Yağı has 24.6 g and Amerikan cevizi has 40.8 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Çörek Otu Yağı —, Amerikan cevizi 14.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.