Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
285 kcal
Score
37 / 100
Dut Pekmezi has a higher nutrition quality score (37) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
261 vs 285(+9.2%)
Score Diff
0 vs 37(+100.0%)
OVERALL WINNER
Dut Pekmezi
Higher energy
Dut Pekmezi
Score leader
Dut Pekmezi
Nutrient split
1 - 16 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Çilek İçecek Şurup and Dut Pekmezi are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Çilek İçecek Şurup has 261.0 kcal and Dut Pekmezi has 285.0 kcal. The difference is 24.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 0 and 37. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
17 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Çilek İçecek Şurup | Dut Pekmezi | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 0 µg | — | — |
| Alfa Karoten | 0 µg | — | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.01 mg | 0.04 mg | +300.0% |
| B12 Vitamini | 0 µg | — | — |
| B12 Vitamini (eklenmiş) | 0 µg | — | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.01 mg | 0.02 mg | +100.0% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0 mg | 0.1 mg | — |
| Bakir | 0.01 mg | 0.15 mg | +1400.0% |
| Besin folati | 0 µg | — | — |
| Beta Karoten | 0 µg | — | — |
| Beta kriptoksantin | 0 µg | — | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 0 mg | — | — |
| D Vitamini | 0 µg | — | — |
| Demir | 0.03 mg | 9.2 mg | +30566.7% |
| DHA (22:6 n-3) | 0 g | — | — |
| Diyet lifi | 0 g | — | — |
| DPA (22:5 n-3) | 0 g | — | — |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 0 mg | — | — |
| E Vitamini (eklenmiş) | 0 mg | — | — |
| Enerji | 261 kj | — | — |
| Enerji (Atwater Özel Faktörleri) | — | 285 kcal | — |
| EPA (20:5 n-3) | 0 g | — | — |
| Etil alkol | 0 g | — | — |
| Folat DFE | 0 µg | — | — |
| Folik asit | 0 µg | — | — |
| Fosfor | 0 mg | 45 mg | — |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 0 µg | — | — |
| Kafein | 0 mg | — | — |
| Kalsiyum | 0 mg | 154 mg | — |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 65.1 g | 70.2 g | +7.8% |
| Kolesterol | 0 mg | — | — |
| Kül | — | 2.5 g | — |
| Likopen | 0 µg | — | — |
| Lutein + zeaksantin | 0 µg | — | — |
| Magnezyum | 1 mg | 62 mg | +6100.0% |
| Mangan | — | 0.35 mg | — |
| MUFA 16:1 | 0 g | — | — |
| MUFA 18:1 (oleik asit) | 0 g | — | — |
| MUFA 20:1 | 0 g | — | — |
| MUFA 22:1 | 0 g | — | — |
| Niasin | 0 mg | 0.2 mg | — |
| Potasyum | 1 mg | 980 mg | +97900.0% |
| Protein | 0 g | 0.5 g | — |
| PUFA 18:2 (linoleik asit) | 0 g | — | — |
| PUFA 18:3 | 0 g | — | — |
| PUFA 18:4 | 0 g | — | — |
| PUFA 20:4 (arasidonik asit) | 0 g | — | — |
| Retinol | 0 µg | — | — |
| Selenyum | 0.4 µg | — | — |
| SFA 10:0 | 0 g | — | — |
| SFA 12:0 | 0 g | — | — |
| SFA 14:0 | 0 g | — | — |
| SFA 16:0 (palmitik asit) | 0 g | — | — |
| SFA 18:0 (stearik asit) | 0 g | — | — |
| SFA 4:0 (butirik asit) | 0 g | — | — |
| SFA 6:0 | 0 g | — | — |
| SFA 8:0 | 0 g | — | — |
| Sodyum | 0 mg | 35 mg | — |
| Su | 34.82 g | 26.5 g | -23.9% |
| Teobromin | 0 mg | — | — |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 0 g | — | — |
| Toplam Folat | 0 µg | — | — |
| Toplam Kolin | 0 mg | — | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 0 g | — | — |
| Toplam yağ | 0.02 g | 0.1 g | +400.0% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 0 g | — | — |
| Toplam Şeker | 65 g | 65.5 g | +0.8% |
| Çinko | 0.06 mg | 0.8 mg | +1233.3% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Çilek İçecek Şurup and Dut Pekmezi.
Çilek İçecek Şurup has less energy per 100 g (261 kcal versus 285 kcal).
For measured Potasyum, Çilek İçecek Şurup has 1 mg and Dut Pekmezi has 980 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Çilek İçecek Şurup 0, Dut Pekmezi 37.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.