Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
659 kcal
Score
24 / 100
Brezilya Cevizi has a higher nutrition quality score (24) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
562 vs 659(+17.3%)
Score Diff
17 vs 24(+41.2%)
OVERALL WINNER
Brezilya Cevizi
Higher energy
Brezilya Cevizi
Score leader
Brezilya Cevizi
Nutrient split
7 - 10 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Çiğ Antep Fıstığı and Brezilya Cevizi are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Çiğ Antep Fıstığı has 562.0 kcal and Brezilya Cevizi has 659.0 kcal. The difference is 97.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 17 and 24. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
17 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Çiğ Antep Fıstığı | Brezilya Cevizi | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.87 mg | 0.617 mg | -29.1% |
| B6 Vitamini | 1.7 mg | — | — |
| Bakir | 1.3 mg | 1.74 mg | +33.8% |
| Demir | 3.92 mg | 2.43 mg | -38.0% |
| Diyet lifi | 10.6 g | 7.5 g | -29.2% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | — | 5.73 mg | — |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | 562 kcal | — | — |
| Folat DFE | — | 22 µg | — |
| Fosfor | 490 mg | 725 mg | +48.0% |
| Kalsiyum | 105 mg | 160 mg | +52.4% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 27.17 g | 12.27 g | -54.8% |
| Magnezyum | 121 mg | 376 mg | +210.7% |
| Mangan | 1.2 mg | 1.22 mg | +1.7% |
| Niasin | — | 0.295 mg | — |
| Potasyum | 1025 mg | 597 mg | -41.8% |
| Protein | 20.16 g | 14.32 g | -29.0% |
| Selenyum | — | 1917 µg | — |
| Sodyum | 1 mg | — | — |
| Su | 3.91 g | 3.48 g | -11.0% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 5.907 g | 15.13 g | +156.1% |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 23.17 g | 24.55 g | +6.0% |
| Toplam yağ | 45.32 g | 66.43 g | +46.6% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 13.23 g | 20.58 g | +55.6% |
| Toplam Şeker | — | 2.33 g | — |
| Çinko | 2.2 mg | 4.06 mg | +84.5% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Çiğ Antep Fıstığı and Brezilya Cevizi.
Çiğ Antep Fıstığı has less energy per 100 g (562 kcal versus 659 kcal).
For measured Magnezyum, Çiğ Antep Fıstığı has 121 mg and Brezilya Cevizi has 376 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Çiğ Antep Fıstığı 17, Brezilya Cevizi 24.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.