Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
204 kcal
Score
19 / 100
Hirayachi has a higher nutrition quality score (19) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
178 vs 204(+14.6%)
Score Diff
16 vs 19(+18.8%)
OVERALL WINNER
Hirayachi
Higher energy
Hirayachi
Score leader
Hirayachi
Nutrient split
4 - 16 (tie: 1)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Chitranna and Hirayachi are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Chitranna has 178.0 kcal and Hirayachi has 204.0 kcal. The difference is 26.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 16 and 19. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
21 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Chitranna | Hirayachi | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | — | 38 µg | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.08 mg | 0.09 mg | +12.5% |
| B12 Vitamini | — | 0.25 µg | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.03 mg | 0.12 mg | +300.0% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.11 mg | — | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 6.8 mg | 4.8 mg | -29.4% |
| Demir | 0.82 mg | 1.25 mg | +52.4% |
| Diyet lifi | 1.4 g | 1.6 g | +14.3% |
| Folat DFE | 28 µg | 42 µg | +50.0% |
| Fosfor | 62 mg | 82 mg | +32.3% |
| Kalsiyum | 24 mg | 32 mg | +33.3% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 28.5 g | 26.4 g | -7.4% |
| Kolesterol | — | 52 mg | — |
| Kül | 1.1 g | — | — |
| Magnezyum | 25 mg | 16 mg | -36.0% |
| Niasin | 1.15 mg | 1.15 mg | 0.0% |
| Potasyum | 115 mg | 165 mg | +43.5% |
| Protein | 3.2 g | 6.2 g | +93.8% |
| Sodyum | 285 mg | 390 mg | +36.8% |
| Su | 60.5 g | 58.2 g | -3.8% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 0.92 g | 1.7 g | +84.8% |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 2.75 g | 3.1 g | +12.7% |
| Toplam yağ | 5.8 g | 7.8 g | +34.5% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 1.68 g | 2.5 g | +48.8% |
| Toplam Şeker | 0.6 g | 1.3 g | +116.7% |
| Çinko | 0.68 mg | 0.72 mg | +5.9% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Chitranna and Hirayachi.
Chitranna has less energy per 100 g (178 kcal versus 204 kcal).
For measured B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin), Chitranna has 0.03 mg and Hirayachi has 0.12 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Chitranna 16, Hirayachi 19.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.