Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
573 kcal
Score
46 / 100
Altın Susam has a higher nutrition quality score (46) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
654 vs 573(-12.4%)
Score Diff
14 vs 46(+228.6%)
OVERALL WINNER
Altın Susam
Higher energy
Ceviz İçi (Yerli)
Score leader
Altın Susam
Nutrient split
4 - 17 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Ceviz İçi (Yerli) and Altın Susam are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Ceviz İçi (Yerli) has 654.0 kcal and Altın Susam has 573.0 kcal. The difference is 81.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 14 and 46. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
21 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Ceviz İçi (Yerli) | Altın Susam | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| ALA (18:3 n-3) | 9.08 g | — | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.34 mg | 0.79 mg | +132.4% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | — | 0.25 mg | — |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.54 mg | 0.79 mg | +46.3% |
| Bakir | 1.59 mg | 4.08 mg | +156.6% |
| Demir | 2.91 mg | 14.55 mg | +400.0% |
| Diyet lifi | 6.7 g | 11.8 g | +76.1% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 0.7 mg | — | — |
| Fosfor | 346 mg | 629 mg | +81.8% |
| Kalsiyum | 98 mg | 975 mg | +894.9% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 13.71 g | 23.45 g | +71.0% |
| Kül | 1.78 g | 4.46 g | +150.6% |
| Magnezyum | 158 mg | 351 mg | +122.2% |
| Mangan | 3.41 mg | 2.46 mg | -27.9% |
| Niasin | — | 4.52 mg | — |
| Potasyum | 441 mg | 468 mg | +6.1% |
| Protein | 15.23 g | 17.73 g | +16.4% |
| Selenyum | 4.9 µg | — | — |
| Sodyum | 2 mg | 11 mg | +450.0% |
| Su | 4.07 g | 4.69 g | +15.2% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 6.13 g | 6.96 g | +13.5% |
| Toplam Folat | 98 µg | 97 µg | -1.0% |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 8.93 g | 18.76 g | +110.1% |
| Toplam yağ | 65.21 g | 49.67 g | -23.8% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 47.17 g | 21.77 g | -53.8% |
| Toplam Şeker | 2.61 g | — | — |
| Çinko | 3.09 mg | 7.75 mg | +150.8% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Ceviz İçi (Yerli) and Altın Susam.
Altın Susam has less energy per 100 g (573 kcal versus 654 kcal).
For measured Kalsiyum, Ceviz İçi (Yerli) has 98 mg and Altın Susam has 975 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Ceviz İçi (Yerli) 14, Altın Susam 46.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.