Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
142 kcal
Score
22 / 100
Bun rieu has a higher nutrition quality score (40) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
86.3 vs 142(+64.5%)
Score Diff
40 vs 22(-45.0%)
OVERALL WINNER
Bun rieu
Higher energy
Agedashi tofu
Score leader
Bun rieu
Nutrient split
3 - 16 (tie: 1)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Bun rieu and Agedashi tofu are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Bun rieu has 86.3 kcal and Agedashi tofu has 142.0 kcal. The difference is 55.7 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 40 and 22. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
20 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Bun rieu | Agedashi tofu | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 32 µg | — | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.04 mg | 0.07 mg | +75.0% |
| B12 Vitamini | 0.32 µg | — | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.05 mg | 0.05 mg | 0.0% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.08 mg | — | — |
| Bakir | 0.08 mg | — | — |
| Beta Karoten | 220 µg | — | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 3.5 mg | — | — |
| Demir | 0.9 mg | 1.42 mg | +57.8% |
| Diyet lifi | 0.7 g | 0.8 g | +14.3% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | — | 1.25 mg | — |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | 86.3 kcal | — | — |
| Folat DFE | 18 µg | 23 µg | +27.8% |
| Fosfor | 58 mg | 98 mg | +69.0% |
| Kalsiyum | 42 mg | 145 mg | +245.2% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 9.8 g | 8.1 g | -17.3% |
| Kolesterol | 15 mg | — | — |
| Kül | — | 1.3 g | — |
| Magnezyum | 14 mg | 46 mg | +228.6% |
| Niasin | 1.15 mg | 0.42 mg | -63.5% |
| Potasyum | 145 mg | 165 mg | +13.8% |
| Protein | 4.8 g | 8.2 g | +70.8% |
| Sodyum | 380 mg | 410 mg | +7.9% |
| Su | 81.2 g | 73.8 g | -9.1% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 0.95 g | 1.32 g | +38.9% |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 1.1 g | 2.45 g | +122.7% |
| Toplam yağ | 3.1 g | 8.6 g | +177.4% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.75 g | 4.38 g | +484.0% |
| Toplam Şeker | 1.1 g | 1.8 g | +63.6% |
| Çinko | 0.65 mg | 0.82 mg | +26.2% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Bun rieu and Agedashi tofu.
Bun rieu has less energy per 100 g (86.3 kcal versus 142 kcal).
For measured Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri, Bun rieu has 0.75 g and Agedashi tofu has 4.38 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Bun rieu 40, Agedashi tofu 22.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.