Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
123 kcal
Score
3 / 100
Bloody Mary has a higher nutrition quality score (31) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
73 vs 123(+68.5%)
Score Diff
31 vs 3(-90.3%)
OVERALL WINNER
Bloody Mary
Higher energy
Tom Collins
Score leader
Bloody Mary
Nutrient split
36 - 4 (tie: 25)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Bloody Mary and Tom Collins are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Bloody Mary has 73.0 kcal and Tom Collins has 123.0 kcal. The difference is 50.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 31 and 3. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
65 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Bloody Mary | Tom Collins | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 17 µg | 0 µg | -100.0% |
| Alfa Karoten | 1 µg | 0 µg | -100.0% |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.03 mg | 0.01 mg | -66.7% |
| B12 Vitamini | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| B12 Vitamini (eklenmiş) | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.06 mg | 0.01 mg | -83.3% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.06 mg | 0 mg | -100.0% |
| Bakir | 0.05 mg | 0.01 mg | -80.0% |
| Besin folati | 15 µg | 0 µg | -100.0% |
| Beta Karoten | 202 µg | 0 µg | -100.0% |
| Beta kriptoksantin | 1 µg | 0 µg | -100.0% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 38.6 mg | 2 mg | -94.8% |
| D Vitamini | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| Demir | 0.34 mg | 0.09 mg | -73.5% |
| DHA (22:6 n-3) | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Diyet lifi | 0.4 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| DPA (22:5 n-3) | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 0.24 mg | 0 mg | -100.0% |
| E Vitamini (eklenmiş) | 0 mg | 0 mg | — |
| Enerji | 73 kj | 123 kj | +68.5% |
| EPA (20:5 n-3) | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Etil alkol | 7.8 g | 8.3 g | +6.4% |
| Folat DFE | 15 µg | 0 µg | -100.0% |
| Folik asit | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| Fosfor | 17 mg | 6 mg | -64.7% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 1.9 µg | 0 µg | -100.0% |
| Kafein | 0 mg | 0 mg | — |
| Kalsiyum | 10 mg | 2 mg | -80.0% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 3.8 g | 16.11 g | +323.9% |
| Kolesterol | 0 mg | 0 mg | — |
| Likopen | 6425 µg | 0 µg | -100.0% |
| Lutein + zeaksantin | 56 µg | 0 µg | -100.0% |
| Magnezyum | 8 mg | 1 mg | -87.5% |
| MUFA 16:1 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| MUFA 18:1 (oleik asit) | 0.01 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| MUFA 20:1 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| MUFA 22:1 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Niasin | 0.11 mg | 0 mg | -100.0% |
| Potasyum | 166 mg | 22 mg | -86.7% |
| Protein | 0.67 g | 0.08 g | -88.1% |
| PUFA 18:2 (linoleik asit) | 0.03 g | 0.01 g | -66.7% |
| PUFA 18:3 | 0.01 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| PUFA 18:4 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| PUFA 20:4 (arasidonik asit) | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Retinol | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| Selenyum | 0.4 µg | 0.3 µg | -25.0% |
| SFA 10:0 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| SFA 12:0 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| SFA 14:0 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| SFA 16:0 (palmitik asit) | 0.01 g | 0.01 g | 0.0% |
| SFA 18:0 (stearik asit) | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| SFA 4:0 (butirik asit) | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| SFA 6:0 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| SFA 8:0 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Sodyum | 200 mg | 77 mg | -61.5% |
| Su | 86.75 g | 75.33 g | -13.2% |
| Teobromin | 0 mg | 0 mg | — |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 0.02 g | 0.01 g | -50.0% |
| Toplam Folat | 15 µg | 0 µg | -100.0% |
| Toplam Kolin | 5.2 mg | 0.7 mg | -86.5% |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.01 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| Toplam yağ | 0.23 g | 0.08 g | -65.2% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.03 g | 0.01 g | -66.7% |
| Toplam Şeker | 2.26 g | 16.11 g | +612.8% |
| Çinko | 0.1 mg | 0.06 mg | -40.0% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Bloody Mary and Tom Collins.
Bloody Mary has less energy per 100 g (73 kcal versus 123 kcal).
For measured Toplam Şeker, Bloody Mary has 2.26 g and Tom Collins has 16.11 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Bloody Mary 31, Tom Collins 3.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.