Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
148 kcal
Score
20 / 100
Bissara has a higher nutrition quality score (32) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
138.5 vs 148(+6.9%)
Score Diff
32 vs 20(-37.5%)
OVERALL WINNER
Bissara
Higher energy
Aleesa
Score leader
Bissara
Nutrient split
10 - 4 (tie: 1)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Bissara and Aleesa are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Bissara has 138.5 kcal and Aleesa has 148.0 kcal. The difference is 9.5 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 32 and 20. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
15 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Bissara | Aleesa | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.12 mg | 0.12 mg | 0.0% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | — | 0.08 mg | — |
| B6 Vitamini | — | 0.14 mg | — |
| Bakir | 0.25 mg | — | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 1.5 mg | — | — |
| Demir | 2.1 mg | 1.2 mg | -42.9% |
| Diyet lifi | 6.1 g | 2.1 g | -65.6% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 0.8 mg | — | — |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | — | 148 kcal | — |
| Folat DFE | 104 µg | — | — |
| Fosfor | 125 mg | 115 mg | -8.0% |
| Kalsiyum | 34 mg | 24 mg | -29.4% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 16.4 g | 18.5 g | +12.8% |
| Kolesterol | — | 18 mg | — |
| Kül | — | 1.2 g | — |
| Magnezyum | 48 mg | 34 mg | -29.2% |
| Mangan | 0.4 mg | — | — |
| Niasin | — | 2.3 mg | — |
| Potasyum | 320 mg | 185 mg | -42.2% |
| Protein | 7.2 g | 8.5 g | +18.1% |
| Sodyum | 210 mg | 275 mg | +31.0% |
| Su | 68.5 g | 68.2 g | -0.4% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 0.8 g | 1.4 g | +75.0% |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 3.9 g | 1.5 g | -61.5% |
| Toplam yağ | 5.8 g | 4.2 g | -27.6% |
| Toplam Şeker | — | 0.4 g | — |
| Çinko | 1.2 mg | 1.1 mg | -8.3% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Bissara and Aleesa.
Bissara has less energy per 100 g (138.5 kcal versus 148 kcal).
For measured Toplam doymus yağ asitleri, Bissara has 0.8 g and Aleesa has 1.4 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Bissara 32, Aleesa 20.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Bissara · Aleesa · Methodology
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.