Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
314 kcal
Score
58 / 100
Katsuobushi has a higher nutrition quality score (58) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
195.7 vs 314(+60.5%)
Score Diff
23 vs 58(+152.2%)
OVERALL WINNER
Katsuobushi
Higher energy
Katsuobushi
Score leader
Katsuobushi
Nutrient split
7 - 9 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Bindaetteok and Katsuobushi are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Bindaetteok has 195.7 kcal and Katsuobushi has 314.0 kcal. The difference is 118.3 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 23 and 58. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
16 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Bindaetteok | Katsuobushi | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.16 mg | 0.15 mg | -6.3% |
| B12 Vitamini | — | 15 µg | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.09 mg | 0.4 mg | +344.4% |
| B6 Vitamini | — | 0.8 mg | — |
| Bakir | 0.18 mg | — | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 5.2 mg | — | — |
| Demir | 1.7 mg | 9 mg | +429.4% |
| DHA (22:6 n-3) | — | 0.8 g | — |
| Diyet lifi | 3.8 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| EPA (20:5 n-3) | — | 0.2 g | — |
| Folat DFE | 62 µg | — | — |
| Fosfor | 125 mg | 800 mg | +540.0% |
| Kalsiyum | 36 mg | 28 mg | -22.2% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 16.9 g | 0.8 g | -95.3% |
| Kolesterol | — | 110 mg | — |
| Kül | 1.8 g | 4.6 g | +155.6% |
| Magnezyum | 42 mg | 70 mg | +66.7% |
| Niasin | 1.45 mg | 45 mg | +3003.4% |
| Potasyum | 290 mg | 940 mg | +224.1% |
| Protein | 8.4 g | 70.6 g | +740.5% |
| Selenyum | — | 120 µg | — |
| Sodyum | 385 mg | 380 mg | -1.3% |
| Su | 62.4 g | 18 g | -71.2% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 2.1 g | — | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 4.3 g | — | — |
| Toplam yağ | 10.5 g | 3.2 g | -69.5% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 3.4 g | — | — |
| Çinko | 1.2 mg | 2.5 mg | +108.3% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Bindaetteok and Katsuobushi.
Bindaetteok has less energy per 100 g (195.7 kcal versus 314 kcal).
For measured Niasin, Bindaetteok has 1.45 mg and Katsuobushi has 45 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Bindaetteok 23, Katsuobushi 58.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.