Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
164 kcal
Score
27 / 100
Biber Biftek has a higher nutrition quality score (58) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
145 vs 164(+13.1%)
Score Diff
58 vs 27(-53.4%)
OVERALL WINNER
Biber Biftek
Higher energy
Tuzlu Dana Köfte
Score leader
Biber Biftek
Nutrient split
32 - 16 (tie: 17)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Biber Biftek and Tuzlu Dana Köfte are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Biber Biftek has 145.0 kcal and Tuzlu Dana Köfte has 164.0 kcal. The difference is 19.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 58 and 27. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
65 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Biber Biftek | Tuzlu Dana Köfte | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 9 µg | 0 µg | -100.0% |
| Alfa Karoten | 7 µg | 0 µg | -100.0% |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.05 mg | 0.07 mg | +40.0% |
| B12 Vitamini | 0.61 µg | 0.41 µg | -32.8% |
| B12 Vitamini (eklenmiş) | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.08 mg | 0.05 mg | -37.5% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.26 mg | 0.23 mg | -11.5% |
| Bakir | 0.07 mg | 0 mg | -100.0% |
| Besin folati | 13 µg | 7 µg | -46.2% |
| Beta Karoten | 101 µg | 0 µg | -100.0% |
| Beta kriptoksantin | 2 µg | 0 µg | -100.0% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 22.6 mg | 0.9 mg | -96.0% |
| D Vitamini | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| Demir | 1.24 mg | 1 mg | -19.4% |
| DHA (22:6 n-3) | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Diyet lifi | 0.7 g | 1.1 g | +57.1% |
| DPA (22:5 n-3) | 0.01 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 1.43 mg | 0.04 mg | -97.2% |
| E Vitamini (eklenmiş) | 0 mg | 0 mg | — |
| Enerji | 145 kj | 164 kj | +13.1% |
| EPA (20:5 n-3) | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Etil alkol | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Folat DFE | 13 µg | 7 µg | -46.2% |
| Folik asit | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| Fosfor | 89 mg | 56 mg | -37.1% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 19.5 µg | 1.8 µg | -90.8% |
| Kafein | 0 mg | 0 mg | — |
| Kalsiyum | 17 mg | 19 mg | +11.8% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 4.34 g | 9.27 g | +113.6% |
| Kolesterol | 32 mg | 32 mg | 0.0% |
| Likopen | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| Lutein + zeaksantin | 173 µg | 5 µg | -97.1% |
| Magnezyum | 16 mg | 13 mg | -18.8% |
| MUFA 16:1 | 0.16 g | 0.77 g | +381.3% |
| MUFA 18:1 (oleik asit) | 3.63 g | 4.49 g | +23.7% |
| MUFA 20:1 | 0.04 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| MUFA 22:1 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Niasin | 2.26 mg | 1.57 mg | -30.5% |
| Potasyum | 202 mg | 172 mg | -14.9% |
| Protein | 11.88 g | 8.73 g | -26.5% |
| PUFA 18:2 (linoleik asit) | 2.11 g | 0.23 g | -89.1% |
| PUFA 18:3 | 0.29 g | 0.07 g | -75.9% |
| PUFA 18:4 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| PUFA 20:4 (arasidonik asit) | 0.01 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| Retinol | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| Selenyum | 11.6 µg | 7.5 µg | -35.3% |
| SFA 10:0 | 0.01 g | 0.03 g | +200.0% |
| SFA 12:0 | 0.01 g | 0.02 g | +100.0% |
| SFA 14:0 | 0.1 g | 0.34 g | +240.0% |
| SFA 16:0 (palmitik asit) | 1.33 g | 2.54 g | +91.0% |
| SFA 18:0 (stearik asit) | 0.52 g | 1.2 g | +130.8% |
| SFA 4:0 (butirik asit) | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| SFA 6:0 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| SFA 8:0 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Sodyum | 244 mg | 412 mg | +68.9% |
| Su | 73.55 g | 70.32 g | -4.4% |
| Teobromin | 0 mg | 0 mg | — |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 2.01 g | 4.32 g | +114.9% |
| Toplam Folat | 13 µg | 7 µg | -46.2% |
| Toplam Kolin | 46 mg | 15.6 mg | -66.1% |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 3.83 g | 5.26 g | +37.3% |
| Toplam yağ | 9.12 g | 10.24 g | +12.3% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 2.42 g | 0.3 g | -87.6% |
| Toplam Şeker | 1.67 g | 0.34 g | -79.6% |
| Çinko | 1.96 mg | 1.4 mg | -28.6% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Biber Biftek and Tuzlu Dana Köfte.
Biber Biftek has less energy per 100 g (145 kcal versus 164 kcal).
For measured MUFA 16:1, Biber Biftek has 0.16 g and Tuzlu Dana Köfte has 0.77 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Biber Biftek 58, Tuzlu Dana Köfte 27.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.