Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
629 kcal
Score
27 / 100
Alp fıstığı has a higher nutrition quality score (27) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
654 vs 629(-3.8%)
Score Diff
14 vs 27(+92.9%)
OVERALL WINNER
Alp fıstığı
Higher energy
Beyaz ceviz
Score leader
Alp fıstığı
Nutrient split
6 - 11 (tie: 1)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Beyaz ceviz and Alp fıstığı are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Beyaz ceviz has 654.0 kcal and Alp fıstığı has 629.0 kcal. The difference is 25.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 14 and 27. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
18 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Beyaz ceviz | Alp fıstığı | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| ALA (18:3 n-3) | 9.08 g | — | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.346 mg | 0.36 mg | +4.0% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | — | 0.23 mg | — |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.537 mg | — | — |
| Bakir | 1.58 mg | — | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | — | 0.8 mg | — |
| Demir | 2.91 mg | 5.5 mg | +89.0% |
| Diyet lifi | 6.7 g | 3.7 g | -44.8% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 0.7 mg | 9.3 mg | +1228.6% |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | 654 kcal | — | — |
| Folat DFE | — | 34 µg | — |
| Fosfor | 346 mg | 575 mg | +66.2% |
| Kalsiyum | 98 mg | 16 mg | -83.7% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 13.71 g | 13.1 g | -4.4% |
| Magnezyum | 158 mg | 251 mg | +58.9% |
| Mangan | 3.41 mg | 8.8 mg | +158.1% |
| Niasin | — | 4.3 mg | — |
| Potasyum | 441 mg | 597 mg | +35.4% |
| Protein | 15.23 g | 13.7 g | -10.0% |
| PUFA 18:2 (linoleik asit) | 38.09 g | — | — |
| Selenyum | 4.9 µg | — | — |
| Sodyum | 2 mg | 2 mg | 0.0% |
| Su | 4.07 g | 5.3 g | +30.2% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 6.13 g | 4.9 g | -20.1% |
| Toplam Folat | 98 µg | — | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 8.93 g | 18.8 g | +110.5% |
| Toplam yağ | 65.21 g | 68.4 g | +4.9% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 47.17 g | 34.1 g | -27.7% |
| Toplam Şeker | 2.61 g | — | — |
| Çinko | 3.09 mg | 6.4 mg | +107.1% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Beyaz ceviz and Alp fıstığı.
Alp fıstığı has less energy per 100 g (629 kcal versus 654 kcal).
For measured E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol), Beyaz ceviz has 0.7 mg and Alp fıstığı has 9.3 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Beyaz ceviz 14, Alp fıstığı 27.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.