Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
31 kcal
Score
78 / 100
Maitake Mantarı has a higher nutrition quality score (78) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
228 vs 31(-86.4%)
Score Diff
66 vs 78(+18.2%)
OVERALL WINNER
Maitake Mantarı
Higher energy
Baobab Meyvesi Tozu
Score leader
Maitake Mantarı
Nutrient split
14 - 5 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Baobab Meyvesi Tozu and Maitake Mantarı are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Baobab Meyvesi Tozu has 228.0 kcal and Maitake Mantarı has 31.0 kcal. The difference is 197.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 66 and 78. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
19 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Baobab Meyvesi Tozu | Maitake Mantarı | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.05 mg | 0.158 mg | +216.0% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.14 mg | 0.242 mg | +72.9% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.06 mg | 0.056 mg | -6.7% |
| Bakir | 0.45 mg | 0.252 mg | -44.0% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 280 mg | — | — |
| D Vitamini | — | 28.1 µg | — |
| D Vitamini (IU) | — | 1124 iu | — |
| D2 Vitamini (ergokalsiferol) | — | 28.1 µg | — |
| Demir | 2.1 mg | 0.3 mg | -85.7% |
| Diyet lifi | 44.5 g | 2.7 g | -93.9% |
| Folat DFE | — | 21 µg | — |
| Fosfor | 48 mg | 74 mg | +54.2% |
| Kalsiyum | 295 mg | 1 mg | -99.7% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 76.2 g | 6.97 g | -90.9% |
| Kül | 5.8 g | 0.53 g | -90.9% |
| Magnezyum | 160 mg | 10 mg | -93.8% |
| Mangan | — | 0.059 mg | — |
| Niasin | 1.8 mg | 6.585 mg | +265.8% |
| Potasyum | 2250 mg | 204 mg | -90.9% |
| Protein | 2.3 g | 1.94 g | -15.7% |
| Selenyum | — | 2.2 µg | — |
| Sodyum | 3 mg | 1 mg | -66.7% |
| Su | 11.2 g | 90.37 g | +706.9% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | — | 0.038 g | — |
| Toplam yağ | 0.3 g | 0.19 g | -36.7% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | — | 0.082 g | — |
| Toplam Şeker | 25.6 g | 2.07 g | -91.9% |
| Çinko | 0.9 mg | 0.76 mg | -15.6% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Baobab Meyvesi Tozu and Maitake Mantarı.
Maitake Mantarı has less energy per 100 g (31 kcal versus 228 kcal).
For measured Su, Baobab Meyvesi Tozu has 11.2 g and Maitake Mantarı has 90.37 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Baobab Meyvesi Tozu 66, Maitake Mantarı 78.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.