Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
270 kcal
Score
12 / 100
Bao Ekmek has a higher nutrition quality score (16) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
273 vs 270(-1.1%)
Score Diff
16 vs 12(-25.0%)
OVERALL WINNER
Bao Ekmek
Higher energy
Bao Ekmek
Score leader
Bao Ekmek
Nutrient split
25 - 22 (tie: 18)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Bao Ekmek and Yumurta Rulo, Etsiz are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Bao Ekmek has 273.0 kcal and Yumurta Rulo, Etsiz has 270.0 kcal. The difference is 3.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 16 and 12. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
65 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Bao Ekmek | Yumurta Rulo, Etsiz | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 0 µg | 46 µg | — |
| Alfa Karoten | 0 µg | 169 µg | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.54 mg | 0.26 mg | -51.9% |
| B12 Vitamini | 0.17 µg | 0 µg | -100.0% |
| B12 Vitamini (eklenmiş) | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.25 mg | 0.23 mg | -8.0% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.16 mg | 0.09 mg | -43.8% |
| Bakir | 0.09 mg | 0.09 mg | 0.0% |
| Besin folati | 7 µg | 62 µg | +785.7% |
| Beta Karoten | 0 µg | 467 µg | — |
| Beta kriptoksantin | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 0.2 mg | 6.3 mg | +3050.0% |
| D Vitamini | 0.2 µg | 0 µg | -100.0% |
| Demir | 2.86 mg | 1.86 mg | -35.0% |
| DHA (22:6 n-3) | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Diyet lifi | 1.2 g | 2.3 g | +91.7% |
| DPA (22:5 n-3) | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 0.33 mg | 2.14 mg | +548.5% |
| E Vitamini (eklenmiş) | 0 mg | 0 mg | — |
| Enerji | 273 kj | 270 kj | -1.1% |
| EPA (20:5 n-3) | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Etil alkol | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Folat DFE | 75 µg | 71 µg | -5.3% |
| Folik asit | 40 µg | 5 µg | -87.5% |
| Fosfor | 152 mg | 68 mg | -55.3% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 1.4 µg | 44.8 µg | +3100.0% |
| Kafein | 0 mg | 0 mg | — |
| Kalsiyum | 140 mg | 47 mg | -66.4% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 39.78 g | 30.02 g | -24.5% |
| Kolesterol | 21 mg | 0 mg | -100.0% |
| Likopen | 0 µg | 9 µg | — |
| Lutein + zeaksantin | 7 µg | 141 µg | +1914.3% |
| Magnezyum | 20 mg | 22 mg | +10.0% |
| MUFA 16:1 | 0.16 g | 0.04 g | -75.0% |
| MUFA 18:1 (oleik asit) | 2.87 g | 4.79 g | +66.9% |
| MUFA 20:1 | 0.06 g | 0.08 g | +33.3% |
| MUFA 22:1 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Niasin | 3.9 mg | 2.38 mg | -39.0% |
| Potasyum | 162 mg | 210 mg | +29.6% |
| Protein | 11.17 g | 5.62 g | -49.7% |
| PUFA 18:2 (linoleik asit) | 1.2 g | 5.43 g | +352.5% |
| PUFA 18:3 | 0.1 g | 0.68 g | +580.0% |
| PUFA 18:4 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| PUFA 20:4 (arasidonik asit) | 0.01 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| Retinol | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| Selenyum | 14.6 µg | 10.5 µg | -28.1% |
| SFA 10:0 | 0.01 g | 0.01 g | 0.0% |
| SFA 12:0 | 0.01 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| SFA 14:0 | 0.07 g | 0.02 g | -71.4% |
| SFA 16:0 (palmitik asit) | 1.46 g | 1.46 g | 0.0% |
| SFA 18:0 (stearik asit) | 0.74 g | 0.47 g | -36.5% |
| SFA 4:0 (butirik asit) | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| SFA 6:0 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| SFA 8:0 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Sodyum | 354 mg | 463 mg | +30.8% |
| Su | 39.29 g | 48.38 g | +23.1% |
| Teobromin | 0 mg | 0 mg | — |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 2.32 g | 2.08 g | -10.3% |
| Toplam Folat | 47 µg | 67 µg | +42.6% |
| Toplam Kolin | 28.4 mg | 13.9 mg | -51.1% |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 3.11 g | 4.91 g | +57.9% |
| Toplam yağ | 7.58 g | 14.14 g | +86.5% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 1.32 g | 6.12 g | +363.6% |
| Toplam Şeker | 5.86 g | 5.63 g | -3.9% |
| Çinko | 0.9 mg | 0.42 mg | -53.3% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Bao Ekmek and Yumurta Rulo, Etsiz.
Yumurta Rulo, Etsiz has less energy per 100 g (270 kcal versus 273 kcal).
For measured K Vitamini (filokinon), Bao Ekmek has 1.4 µg and Yumurta Rulo, Etsiz has 44.8 µg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Bao Ekmek 16, Yumurta Rulo, Etsiz 12.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.