Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
70.5 kcal
Score
41 / 100
Bakso has a higher nutrition quality score (42) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
175 vs 70.5(-59.7%)
Score Diff
42 vs 41(-2.4%)
OVERALL WINNER
Bakso
Higher energy
Bakso
Score leader
Bakso
Nutrient split
14 - 5 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Bakso and Chorba frik are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Bakso has 175.0 kcal and Chorba frik has 70.5 kcal. The difference is 104.5 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 42 and 41. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
19 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Bakso | Chorba frik | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | — | 25 µg | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.05 mg | 0.06 mg | +20.0% |
| B12 Vitamini | 1.1 µg | 0.2 µg | -81.8% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.12 mg | 0.05 mg | -58.3% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.18 mg | — | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | — | 2.5 mg | — |
| Demir | 1.8 mg | 0.9 mg | -50.0% |
| Diyet lifi | 0.4 g | 1.5 g | +275.0% |
| Fosfor | 135 mg | 45 mg | -66.7% |
| Kalsiyum | 24 mg | 18 mg | -25.0% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 11.8 g | 7.5 g | -36.4% |
| Kolesterol | 42 mg | — | — |
| Kül | 2.3 g | 1.7 g | -26.1% |
| Magnezyum | 14 mg | 15 mg | +7.1% |
| Niasin | 2.6 mg | 1.1 mg | -57.7% |
| Potasyum | 195 mg | 180 mg | -7.7% |
| Protein | 13.5 g | 4.5 g | -66.7% |
| Sodyum | 680 mg | 320 mg | -52.9% |
| Su | 63.8 g | 82.3 g | +29.0% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 3.4 g | 0.8 g | -76.5% |
| Toplam Folat | — | 15 µg | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 3.6 g | — | — |
| Toplam yağ | 8.2 g | 2.5 g | -69.5% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.4 g | — | — |
| Toplam Şeker | 0.2 g | 1.2 g | +500.0% |
| Çinko | 2.4 mg | 0.6 mg | -75.0% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Bakso and Chorba frik.
Chorba frik has less energy per 100 g (70.5 kcal versus 175 kcal).
For measured Toplam Şeker, Bakso has 0.2 g and Chorba frik has 1.2 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Bakso 42, Chorba frik 41.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.