Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
654 kcal
Score
15 / 100
Badem (Kavrulmamış) has a higher nutrition quality score (23) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
579 vs 654(+13.0%)
Score Diff
23 vs 15(-34.8%)
OVERALL WINNER
Badem (Kavrulmamış)
Higher energy
Çiğ Ceviz
Score leader
Badem (Kavrulmamış)
Nutrient split
15 - 7 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Badem (Kavrulmamış) and Çiğ Ceviz are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Badem (Kavrulmamış) has 579.0 kcal and Çiğ Ceviz has 654.0 kcal. The difference is 75.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 23 and 15. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
22 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Badem (Kavrulmamış) | Çiğ Ceviz | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.205 mg | 0.34 mg | +65.9% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 1.138 mg | 0.15 mg | -86.8% |
| B6 Vitamini | — | 0.54 mg | — |
| Bakir | 1.031 mg | 1.58 mg | +53.2% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | — | 1.3 mg | — |
| Demir | 3.71 mg | 2.91 mg | -21.6% |
| Diyet lifi | 12.5 g | 6.7 g | -46.4% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 25.63 mg | 0.7 mg | -97.3% |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | — | 654 kcal | — |
| Folat DFE | 44 µg | — | — |
| Fosfor | 481 mg | 346 mg | -28.1% |
| Kalsiyum | 269 mg | 98 mg | -63.6% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 21.55 g | 13.71 g | -36.4% |
| Magnezyum | 270 mg | 158 mg | -41.5% |
| Mangan | 2.179 mg | 3.41 mg | +56.5% |
| Niasin | 3.618 mg | 1.13 mg | -68.8% |
| Potasyum | 733 mg | 441 mg | -39.8% |
| Protein | 21.15 g | 15.23 g | -28.0% |
| Selenyum | — | 4.9 µg | — |
| Sodyum | 1 mg | 2 mg | +100.0% |
| Su | 4.41 g | 4.07 g | -7.7% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 3.802 g | 6.13 g | +61.2% |
| Toplam Folat | — | 98 µg | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 31.551 g | 8.93 g | -71.7% |
| Toplam yağ | 49.93 g | 65.21 g | +30.6% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 12.329 g | 47.17 g | +282.6% |
| Toplam Şeker | 4.35 g | 2.61 g | -40.0% |
| Çinko | 3.12 mg | 3.09 mg | -1.0% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Badem (Kavrulmamış) and Çiğ Ceviz.
Badem (Kavrulmamış) has less energy per 100 g (579 kcal versus 654 kcal).
For measured Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri, Badem (Kavrulmamış) has 12.329 g and Çiğ Ceviz has 47.17 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Badem (Kavrulmamış) 23, Çiğ Ceviz 15.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.