Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
562 kcal
Score
18 / 100
Badem (Çiğ) has a higher nutrition quality score (23) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
579 vs 562(-2.9%)
Score Diff
23 vs 18(-21.7%)
OVERALL WINNER
Badem (Çiğ)
Higher energy
Badem (Çiğ)
Score leader
Badem (Çiğ)
Nutrient split
11 - 6 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Badem (Çiğ) and Antep Fıstığı (Çiğ) are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Badem (Çiğ) has 579.0 kcal and Antep Fıstığı (Çiğ) has 562.0 kcal. The difference is 17.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 23 and 18. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
17 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Badem (Çiğ) | Antep Fıstığı (Çiğ) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | — | 26 µg | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | — | 0.87 mg | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 1.138 mg | 0.16 mg | -85.9% |
| B6 Vitamini | — | 1.7 mg | — |
| Bakir | 1.031 mg | 1.3 mg | +26.1% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | — | 5.6 mg | — |
| Demir | 3.71 mg | 3.92 mg | +5.7% |
| Diyet lifi | 12.5 g | 10.6 g | -15.2% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 25.63 mg | 2.3 mg | -91.0% |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | 579 kcal | — | — |
| Folat DFE | 44 µg | 51 µg | +15.9% |
| Fosfor | 481 mg | 490 mg | +1.9% |
| Kalsiyum | 269 mg | 105 mg | -61.0% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 21.55 g | 27.17 g | +26.1% |
| Magnezyum | 270 mg | 121 mg | -55.2% |
| Mangan | 2.179 mg | 1.2 mg | -44.9% |
| Niasin | 3.618 mg | 1.3 mg | -64.1% |
| Potasyum | 733 mg | 1025 mg | +39.8% |
| Protein | 21.15 g | 20.16 g | -4.7% |
| Sodyum | — | 1 mg | — |
| Su | 4.41 g | 4.37 g | -0.9% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 3.802 g | — | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 31.551 g | — | — |
| Toplam yağ | 49.93 g | 45.32 g | -9.2% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 12.329 g | — | — |
| Toplam Şeker | — | 7.66 g | — |
| Çinko | 3.12 mg | 2.2 mg | -29.5% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Badem (Çiğ) and Antep Fıstığı (Çiğ).
Antep Fıstığı (Çiğ) has less energy per 100 g (562 kcal versus 579 kcal).
For measured E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol), Badem (Çiğ) has 25.63 mg and Antep Fıstığı (Çiğ) has 2.3 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Badem (Çiğ) 23, Antep Fıstığı (Çiğ) 18.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.