Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
311 kcal
Score
87 / 100
Arpa Çimi Tozu has a higher nutrition quality score (87) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
365 vs 311(-14.8%)
Score Diff
53 vs 87(+64.2%)
OVERALL WINNER
Arpa Çimi Tozu
Higher energy
Ayçiçeği Proteini Tozu
Score leader
Arpa Çimi Tozu
Nutrient split
8 - 10 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Ayçiçeği Proteini Tozu and Arpa Çimi Tozu are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Ayçiçeği Proteini Tozu has 365.0 kcal and Arpa Çimi Tozu has 311.0 kcal. The difference is 54.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 53 and 87. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
18 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Ayçiçeği Proteini Tozu | Arpa Çimi Tozu | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | — | 4200 µg | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 1.3 mg | 1.1 mg | -15.4% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.45 mg | 2.3 mg | +411.1% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.82 mg | 1.2 mg | +46.3% |
| Bakir | 1.9 mg | 0.6 mg | -68.4% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | — | 160 mg | — |
| Demir | 7.4 mg | 18 mg | +143.2% |
| Diyet lifi | 15.2 g | 34 g | +123.7% |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | — | 311 kcal | — |
| Folat DFE | 225 µg | 850 µg | +277.8% |
| Fosfor | 720 mg | 460 mg | -36.1% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | — | 780 µg | — |
| Kalsiyum | 135 mg | 340 mg | +151.9% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 18.4 g | 28.1 g | +52.7% |
| Magnezyum | 325 mg | 190 mg | -41.5% |
| Mangan | 2.2 mg | 3.4 mg | +54.5% |
| Niasin | 8.7 mg | 6.2 mg | -28.7% |
| Pantotenik asit | 6.9 mg | — | — |
| Potasyum | 880 mg | 2900 mg | +229.5% |
| Protein | 46.5 g | 24.5 g | -47.3% |
| Selenyum | 68 µg | — | — |
| Sodyum | 12 mg | 60 mg | +400.0% |
| Toplam yağ | 9.8 g | 3.2 g | -67.3% |
| Çinko | 5.8 mg | 2.8 mg | -51.7% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Ayçiçeği Proteini Tozu and Arpa Çimi Tozu.
Arpa Çimi Tozu has less energy per 100 g (311 kcal versus 365 kcal).
For measured B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin), Ayçiçeği Proteini Tozu has 0.45 mg and Arpa Çimi Tozu has 2.3 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Ayçiçeği Proteini Tozu 53, Arpa Çimi Tozu 87.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.