Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
418 kcal
Score
29 / 100
Ayçekirdeği (Tuzsuz) and Akçaağaç tohumu have the same nutrition score (29).
Energy Diff
584 vs 418(-28.4%)
Score Diff
29 vs 29(0.0%)
Higher energy
Ayçekirdeği (Tuzsuz)
Score leader
Score is equal
Nutrient split
13 - 8 (tie: 1)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Ayçekirdeği (Tuzsuz) and Akçaağaç tohumu are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Ayçekirdeği (Tuzsuz) has 584.0 kcal and Akçaağaç tohumu has 418.0 kcal. The difference is 166.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 29 and 29. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
22 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Ayçekirdeği (Tuzsuz) | Akçaağaç tohumu | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 1.48 mg | 0.35 mg | -76.4% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.36 mg | 0.18 mg | -50.0% |
| B6 Vitamini | 1.35 mg | 0.42 mg | -68.9% |
| Bakir | 1.8 mg | 0.85 mg | -52.8% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | — | 2.4 mg | — |
| Demir | 5.25 mg | 4.8 mg | -8.6% |
| Diyet lifi | 8.6 g | 11.5 g | +33.7% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 35.17 mg | — | — |
| Folat DFE | — | 62 µg | — |
| Fosfor | 660 mg | 390 mg | -40.9% |
| Kalsiyum | 78 mg | 145 mg | +85.9% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 20 g | 38.6 g | +93.0% |
| Kül | — | 3.7 g | — |
| Magnezyum | 325 mg | 180 mg | -44.6% |
| Mangan | 1.95 mg | 2.6 mg | +33.3% |
| Niasin | 8.34 mg | 2.1 mg | -74.8% |
| Pantotenik asit | 1.14 mg | — | — |
| Potasyum | 645 mg | 650 mg | +0.8% |
| Protein | 20.78 g | 22.4 g | +7.8% |
| Selenyum | 53 µg | — | — |
| Sodyum | 9 mg | 9 mg | 0.0% |
| Su | 4.7 g | 18.5 g | +293.6% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 4.46 g | 2.1 g | -52.9% |
| Toplam Folat | 227 µg | — | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 18.52 g | 6.5 g | -64.9% |
| Toplam yağ | 51.46 g | 16.8 g | -67.4% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 23.14 g | 7.2 g | -68.9% |
| Toplam Şeker | 2.62 g | 4.2 g | +60.3% |
| Çinko | 5 mg | 3.2 mg | -36.0% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Ayçekirdeği (Tuzsuz) and Akçaağaç tohumu.
Akçaağaç tohumu has less energy per 100 g (418 kcal versus 584 kcal).
For measured Su, Ayçekirdeği (Tuzsuz) has 4.7 g and Akçaağaç tohumu has 18.5 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Ayçekirdeği (Tuzsuz) 29, Akçaağaç tohumu 29.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.