Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Ay çekirdeği proteini has a higher nutrition quality score (57) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
380 vs 418(+10.0%)
Score Diff
57 vs 29(-49.1%)
OVERALL WINNER
Ay çekirdeği proteini
Higher energy
Akçaağaç tohumu
Score leader
Ay çekirdeği proteini
Nutrient split
11 - 6 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Ay çekirdeği proteini and Akçaağaç tohumu are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Ay çekirdeği proteini has 380.0 kcal and Akçaağaç tohumu has 418.0 kcal. The difference is 38.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 57 and 29. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
17 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Ay çekirdeği proteini | Akçaağaç tohumu | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arjinin | 4.5 g | — | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 1.2 mg | 0.35 mg | -70.8% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.3 mg | 0.18 mg | -40.0% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.8 mg | 0.42 mg | -47.5% |
| Bakir | 1.8 mg | 0.85 mg | -52.8% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | — | 2.4 mg | — |
| Demir | 8.5 mg | 4.8 mg | -43.5% |
| Diyet lifi | 10 g | 11.5 g | +15.0% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 5 mg | — | — |
| Folat DFE | 220 µg | 62 µg | -71.8% |
| Fosfor | — | 390 mg | — |
| Glutamik asit | 11.5 g | — | — |
| Kalsiyum | 140 mg | 145 mg | +3.6% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 15 g | 38.6 g | +157.3% |
| Kül | — | 3.7 g | — |
| Lizin | 2.1 g | — | — |
| Magnezyum | 350 mg | 180 mg | -48.6% |
| Mangan | 2.5 mg | 2.6 mg | +4.0% |
| Niasin | — | 2.1 mg | — |
| Potasyum | 900 mg | 650 mg | -27.8% |
| Protein | 55 g | 22.4 g | -59.3% |
| Selenyum | 70 µg | — | — |
| Sodyum | 20 mg | 9 mg | -55.0% |
| Su | 5 g | 18.5 g | +270.0% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | — | 2.1 g | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | — | 6.5 g | — |
| Toplam yağ | 12 g | 16.8 g | +40.0% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | — | 7.2 g | — |
| Toplam Şeker | — | 4.2 g | — |
| Çinko | 7 mg | 3.2 mg | -54.3% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Ay çekirdeği proteini and Akçaağaç tohumu.
Ay çekirdeği proteini has less energy per 100 g (380 kcal versus 418 kcal).
For measured Su, Ay çekirdeği proteini has 5 g and Akçaağaç tohumu has 18.5 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Ay çekirdeği proteini 57, Akçaağaç tohumu 29.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.