Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
44 kcal
Score
56 / 100
Amla (Hint Bektaşi Üzümü), Çiğ has a higher nutrition quality score (56) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
160 vs 44(-72.5%)
Score Diff
24 vs 56(+133.3%)
OVERALL WINNER
Amla (Hint Bektaşi Üzümü), Çiğ
Higher energy
Avokado
Score leader
Amla (Hint Bektaşi Üzümü), Çiğ
Nutrient split
13 - 5 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Avokado and Amla (Hint Bektaşi Üzümü), Çiğ are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Avokado has 160.0 kcal and Amla (Hint Bektaşi Üzümü), Çiğ has 44.0 kcal. The difference is 116.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 24 and 56. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
18 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Avokado | Amla (Hint Bektaşi Üzümü), Çiğ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | — | 15 µg | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | — | 0.03 mg | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | — | 0.04 mg | — |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.257 mg | 0.08 mg | -68.9% |
| Bakir | 0.19 mg | 0.015 mg | -92.1% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 10 mg | 445 mg | +4350.0% |
| Demir | 0.55 mg | 1.2 mg | +118.2% |
| Diyet lifi | 6.7 g | 4.3 g | -35.8% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 2.07 mg | — | — |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | 160 kcal | 44 kcal | -72.5% |
| Folat DFE | 81 µg | 6 µg | -92.6% |
| Fosfor | — | 27 mg | — |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 21 µg | — | — |
| Kalsiyum | 12 mg | 25 mg | +108.3% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 8.53 g | 10.18 g | +19.3% |
| Kül | — | 0.5 g | — |
| Magnezyum | 29 mg | 10 mg | -65.5% |
| Mangan | 0.142 mg | 0.14 mg | -1.4% |
| Niasin | 1.738 mg | 0.15 mg | -91.4% |
| Pantotenik asit | 1.389 mg | — | — |
| Potasyum | 485 mg | 198 mg | -59.2% |
| Protein | 2 g | 0.88 g | -56.0% |
| Sodyum | 7 mg | 1 mg | -85.7% |
| Su | 73.23 g | 86.1 g | +17.6% |
| Toplam yağ | 14.66 g | 0.58 g | -96.0% |
| Toplam Şeker | 0.66 g | — | — |
| Çinko | 0.64 mg | 0.12 mg | -81.3% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Avokado and Amla (Hint Bektaşi Üzümü), Çiğ.
Amla (Hint Bektaşi Üzümü), Çiğ has less energy per 100 g (44 kcal versus 160 kcal).
For measured C Vitamini (askorbik asit), Avokado has 10 mg and Amla (Hint Bektaşi Üzümü), Çiğ has 445 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Avokado 24, Amla (Hint Bektaşi Üzümü), Çiğ 56.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.