Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
61 kcal
Score
43 / 100
Kivi has a higher nutrition quality score (43) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
160 vs 61(-61.9%)
Score Diff
24 vs 43(+79.2%)
OVERALL WINNER
Kivi
Higher energy
Avokado, Taze
Score leader
Kivi
Nutrient split
11 - 6 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Avokado, Taze and Kivi are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Avokado, Taze has 160.0 kcal and Kivi has 61.0 kcal. The difference is 99.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 24 and 43. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
17 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Avokado, Taze | Kivi | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | — | 0.027 mg | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | — | 0.025 mg | — |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.257 mg | 0.063 mg | -75.5% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 10 mg | 92.7 mg | +827.0% |
| Demir | 0.55 mg | 0.31 mg | -43.6% |
| Diyet lifi | 6.7 g | 3 g | -55.2% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 2.07 mg | 1.46 mg | -29.5% |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | 160 kcal | — | — |
| Enerji (Atwater Özel Faktörleri) | — | 61 kcal | — |
| Folat DFE | 81 µg | — | — |
| Fosfor | 52 mg | 34 mg | -34.6% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 21 µg | 40.3 µg | +91.9% |
| Kalsiyum | 12 mg | 34 mg | +183.3% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 8.53 g | 14.66 g | +71.9% |
| Magnezyum | 29 mg | 17 mg | -41.4% |
| MUFA 18:1 (oleik asit) | 9.8 g | — | — |
| Niasin | 1.738 mg | 0.341 mg | -80.4% |
| Potasyum | 485 mg | 312 mg | -35.7% |
| Protein | 2 g | 1.14 g | -43.0% |
| Sodyum | — | 3 mg | — |
| Su | 73.23 g | 83.07 g | +13.4% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 2.13 g | — | — |
| Toplam Folat | — | 25 µg | — |
| Toplam yağ | 14.66 g | 0.52 g | -96.5% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 1.82 g | — | — |
| Toplam Şeker | 0.66 g | 8.99 g | +1262.1% |
| Çinko | 0.64 mg | 0.14 mg | -78.1% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Avokado, Taze and Kivi.
Kivi has less energy per 100 g (61 kcal versus 160 kcal).
For measured Toplam Şeker, Avokado, Taze has 0.66 g and Kivi has 8.99 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Avokado, Taze 24, Kivi 43.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.