Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
53 kcal
Score
41 / 100
Altın Çilek (Yer Kirazı) has a higher nutrition quality score (41) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
160 vs 53(-66.9%)
Score Diff
24 vs 41(+70.8%)
OVERALL WINNER
Altın Çilek (Yer Kirazı)
Higher energy
Avokado, Taze
Score leader
Altın Çilek (Yer Kirazı)
Nutrient split
7 - 5 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Avokado, Taze and Altın Çilek (Yer Kirazı) are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Avokado, Taze has 160.0 kcal and Altın Çilek (Yer Kirazı) has 53.0 kcal. The difference is 107.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 24 and 41. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
12 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Avokado, Taze | Altın Çilek (Yer Kirazı) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | — | 36 µg | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | — | 0.11 mg | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | — | 0.04 mg | — |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.257 mg | — | — |
| Bakir | — | 0.056 mg | — |
| Beta Karoten | — | 432 µg | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 10 mg | 11 mg | +10.0% |
| Demir | 0.55 mg | 1 mg | +81.8% |
| Diyet lifi | 6.7 g | 4.8 g | -28.4% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 2.07 mg | — | — |
| Enerji | — | 222 kj | — |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | 160 kcal | — | — |
| Folat DFE | 81 µg | — | — |
| Fosfor | 52 mg | 40 mg | -23.1% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 21 µg | — | — |
| Kalsiyum | 12 mg | 9 mg | -25.0% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 8.53 g | 11.2 g | +31.3% |
| Kül | — | 0.8 g | — |
| Magnezyum | 29 mg | — | — |
| MUFA 18:1 (oleik asit) | 9.8 g | — | — |
| Niasin | 1.738 mg | 2.8 mg | +61.1% |
| Potasyum | 485 mg | 170 mg | -64.9% |
| Protein | 2 g | 1.9 g | -5.0% |
| Sodyum | — | 1 mg | — |
| Su | 73.23 g | 85.4 g | +16.6% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 2.13 g | — | — |
| Toplam yağ | 14.66 g | 0.7 g | -95.2% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 1.82 g | — | — |
| Toplam Şeker | 0.66 g | — | — |
| Çinko | 0.64 mg | 0.1 mg | -84.4% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Avokado, Taze and Altın Çilek (Yer Kirazı).
Altın Çilek (Yer Kirazı) has less energy per 100 g (53 kcal versus 160 kcal).
For measured Toplam yağ, Avokado, Taze has 14.66 g and Altın Çilek (Yer Kirazı) has 0.7 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Avokado, Taze 24, Altın Çilek (Yer Kirazı) 41.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.