Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
160 kcal
Score
24 / 100
Avokado, Taze has a higher nutrition quality score (24) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
160 vs 160(0.0%)
Score Diff
18 vs 24(+33.3%)
OVERALL WINNER
Avokado, Taze
Higher energy
Energy is equal
Score leader
Avokado, Taze
Nutrient split
0 - 0 (tie: 17)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Avokado, Taze (Hass) and Avokado, Taze are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Avokado, Taze (Hass) has 160.0 kcal and Avokado, Taze has 160.0 kcal. The difference is 0.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 18 and 24. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
17 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Avokado, Taze (Hass) | Avokado, Taze | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| B6 Vitamini | 0.257 mg | 0.257 mg | 0.0% |
| Bakir | 0.19 mg | — | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 10 mg | 10 mg | 0.0% |
| Demir | — | 0.55 mg | — |
| Diyet lifi | 6.7 g | 6.7 g | 0.0% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 2.07 mg | 2.07 mg | 0.0% |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | 160 kcal | 160 kcal | 0.0% |
| Folat DFE | 81 µg | 81 µg | 0.0% |
| Fosfor | — | 52 mg | — |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 21 µg | 21 µg | 0.0% |
| Kalsiyum | — | 12 mg | — |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 8.53 g | 8.53 g | 0.0% |
| Lutein + zeaksantin | 271 µg | — | — |
| Magnezyum | 29 mg | 29 mg | 0.0% |
| MUFA 18:1 (oleik asit) | — | 9.8 g | — |
| Niasin | 1.738 mg | 1.738 mg | 0.0% |
| Potasyum | 485 mg | 485 mg | 0.0% |
| Protein | 2 g | 2 g | 0.0% |
| Sodyum | 7 mg | — | — |
| Su | 73.23 g | 73.23 g | 0.0% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 2.13 g | 2.13 g | 0.0% |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 9.8 g | — | — |
| Toplam yağ | 14.66 g | 14.66 g | 0.0% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 1.82 g | 1.82 g | 0.0% |
| Toplam Şeker | 0.66 g | 0.66 g | 0.0% |
| Çinko | — | 0.64 mg | — |
Scientific answers to key differences between Avokado, Taze (Hass) and Avokado, Taze.
The records show 160 kcal per 100 g for both foods.
For measured B6 Vitamini, Avokado, Taze (Hass) has 0.257 mg and Avokado, Taze has 0.257 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Avokado, Taze (Hass) 18, Avokado, Taze 24.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.