Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
28.5 kcal
Score
90 / 100
Kanlıca Çam Mantarı has a higher nutrition quality score (90) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
43 vs 28.5(-33.7%)
Score Diff
49 vs 90(+83.7%)
OVERALL WINNER
Kanlıca Çam Mantarı
Higher energy
Aslan Yelesi Mantarı
Score leader
Kanlıca Çam Mantarı
Nutrient split
6 - 14 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Aslan Yelesi Mantarı and Kanlıca Çam Mantarı are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Aslan Yelesi Mantarı has 43.0 kcal and Kanlıca Çam Mantarı has 28.5 kcal. The difference is 14.5 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 49 and 90. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
20 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Aslan Yelesi Mantarı | Kanlıca Çam Mantarı | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.14 mg | 0.11 mg | -21.4% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.36 mg | 0.35 mg | -2.8% |
| B6 Vitamini | — | 0.14 mg | — |
| Bakir | 0.19 mg | 0.38 mg | +100.0% |
| Beta-glukan | 2.15 g | 0.8 g | -62.8% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 1.1 mg | 3.2 mg | +190.9% |
| D Vitamini | 0.15 µg | — | — |
| D2 Vitamini (ergokalsiferol) | — | 2.8 µg | — |
| Demir | 0.41 mg | 1.8 mg | +339.0% |
| Diyet lifi | 3.4 g | 2.4 g | -29.4% |
| Ergosterol | — | 42 mg | — |
| Folat DFE | — | 32 µg | — |
| Fosfor | 82 mg | 85 mg | +3.7% |
| Kalsiyum | — | 15 mg | — |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 7.58 g | 4.2 g | -44.6% |
| Kül | 0.84 g | 0.9 g | +7.1% |
| Magnezyum | 12 mg | 16 mg | +33.3% |
| Niasin | 1.62 mg | 4.1 mg | +153.1% |
| Pantotenik asit | 1.45 mg | — | — |
| Potasyum | 304 mg | 390 mg | +28.3% |
| Protein | 2.63 g | 2.3 g | -12.5% |
| Selenyum | 1.4 µg | 9.5 µg | +578.6% |
| Sodyum | 4 mg | 5 mg | +25.0% |
| Su | 88.6 g | 91.8 g | +3.6% |
| Toplam yağ | 0.35 g | 0.6 g | +71.4% |
| Toplam Şeker | 0.52 g | 1.2 g | +130.8% |
| Çinko | 0.74 mg | 0.85 mg | +14.9% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Aslan Yelesi Mantarı and Kanlıca Çam Mantarı.
Kanlıca Çam Mantarı has less energy per 100 g (28.5 kcal versus 43 kcal).
For measured Selenyum, Aslan Yelesi Mantarı has 1.4 µg and Kanlıca Çam Mantarı has 9.5 µg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Aslan Yelesi Mantarı 49, Kanlıca Çam Mantarı 90.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.