Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
33 kcal
Score
100 / 100
Mantar, Kayın has a higher nutrition quality score (100) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
— vs 33
Score Diff
0 vs 100(+100.0%)
OVERALL WINNER
Mantar, Kayın
Higher energy
Measurement missing
Score leader
Mantar, Kayın
Nutrient split
5 - 11 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Arpacık Soğanı, Yumru, Soyulmuş, Kökü Alınmış, Çiğ and Mantar, Kayın are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
An energy measurement is missing, so an energy difference cannot be calculated.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 0 and 100. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
16 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Arpacık Soğanı - Çiğ | Mantar, Kayın | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Azot | 0.22 g | 0.35 g | +59.1% |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | — | 0.01 mg | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | — | 0.21 mg | — |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.18 mg | 0.11 mg | -38.9% |
| Bakir | 0.08 mg | 0.07 mg | -12.5% |
| Beta-glukan | — | 1.96 g | — |
| Beta-sitostanol | — | 0 mg | — |
| Beta-sitosterol | — | 0 mg | — |
| Biyotin | 1.36 µg | 8.07 µg | +493.4% |
| D Vitamini | — | 0.37 µg | — |
| D Vitamini (IU) | — | 14.8 iu | — |
| D2 Vitamini (ergokalsiferol) | — | 0.37 µg | — |
| Delta-5-avenasterol | — | 0 mg | — |
| Delta-7-stigmastenol | — | 0 mg | — |
| Demir | 0.33 mg | 0.74 mg | +124.2% |
| Diyet lifi | 2.2 g | 3.14 g | +42.7% |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | — | 39.8 kcal | — |
| Enerji (Atwater Özel Faktörleri) | — | 33 kcal | — |
| Ergosta-5,7-dienol | — | 13.9 mg | — |
| Ergosta-7,22-dienol | — | 0.33 mg | — |
| Ergosta-7-enol | — | 2.31 mg | — |
| Ergosterol | — | 54.7 mg | — |
| Ergotiyonin | — | 5.38 mg | — |
| Fenilalanin | — | 0.67 g | — |
| Fosfor | 54.63 mg | 85.9 mg | +57.2% |
| Fruktoz | 1.88 g | — | — |
| Glikoz | 0.5 g | — | — |
| Glutatyon | — | 9.8 mg | — |
| Histidin | — | 0.43 g | — |
| Izolosin | — | 0.65 g | — |
| Kalsiyum | 26.06 mg | 0.43 mg | -98.3% |
| Kampesterol | — | 0 mg | — |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | — | 6.76 g | — |
| Kül | 0.63 g | 0.76 g | +20.6% |
| Laktoz | 0.03 g | — | — |
| Lizin | — | 1.03 g | — |
| Losin | — | 1.08 g | — |
| Magnezyum | 15.1 mg | 10.49 mg | -30.5% |
| Maltoz | 0.03 g | — | — |
| Mangan | 0.15 mg | 0.16 mg | +6.7% |
| Metiyonin | — | 0.2 g | — |
| Niasin | — | 6.4 mg | — |
| Potasyum | 251.5 mg | 375.9 mg | +49.5% |
| Protein | 1.38 g | 2.18 g | +58.0% |
| Sakkaroz | 1.91 g | — | — |
| Selenyum | — | 0.38 µg | — |
| Sodyum | 3.64 mg | 0.89 mg | -75.5% |
| Stigmasterol | — | 0 mg | — |
| Su | 83.47 g | 89.85 g | +7.6% |
| Toplam yağ | — | 0.45 g | — |
| Toplam Şeker | 4.35 g | — | — |
| Treonin | — | 0.83 g | — |
| Triptofan | — | 0.3 g | — |
| Valin | — | 1.29 g | — |
| Vitamin D4 | — | 0.14 µg | — |
| Çinko | 0.28 mg | 0.5 mg | +78.6% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Arpacık Soğanı, Yumru, Soyulmuş, Kökü Alınmış, Çiğ and Mantar, Kayın.
At least one energy measurement is missing, so the foods cannot be ranked by calories.
For measured Biyotin, Arpacık Soğanı - Çiğ has 1.36 µg and Mantar, Kayın has 8.07 µg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Arpacık Soğanı - Çiğ 0, Mantar, Kayın 100.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Arpacık Soğanı, Yumru, Soyulmuş, Kökü Alınmış, Çiğ · Mantar, Kayın · Methodology
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.