Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Ardahan çeçil peyniri has a higher nutrition quality score (35) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
228.6 vs 115(-49.7%)
Score Diff
35 vs 23(-34.3%)
OVERALL WINNER
Ardahan çeçil peyniri
Higher energy
Ardahan çeçil peyniri
Score leader
Ardahan çeçil peyniri
Nutrient split
15 - 5 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Ardahan çeçil peyniri and Sütlü irmik are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Ardahan çeçil peyniri has 228.6 kcal and Sütlü irmik has 115.0 kcal. The difference is 113.6 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 35 and 23. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
20 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Ardahan çeçil peyniri | Sütlü irmik | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 95 µg | 40 µg | -57.9% |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | — | 0.03 mg | — |
| B12 Vitamini | 1.35 µg | 0.35 µg | -74.1% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.38 mg | 0.15 mg | -60.5% |
| D Vitamini | — | 0.5 µg | — |
| Demir | 0.45 mg | 0.1 mg | -77.8% |
| Diyet lifi | 0 g | 0.5 g | — |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | — | 115 kcal | — |
| Folat DFE | — | 4 µg | — |
| Fosfor | 490 mg | 75 mg | -84.7% |
| Kalsiyum | 680 mg | 100 mg | -85.3% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 2.1 g | 18.5 g | +781.0% |
| Kolesterol | 36 mg | 9 mg | -75.0% |
| Kül | 5.8 g | — | — |
| Laktoz | — | 4 g | — |
| Magnezyum | 28 mg | 8 mg | -71.4% |
| Potasyum | 115 mg | 125 mg | +8.7% |
| Protein | 28.5 g | 3.8 g | -86.7% |
| Sakkaroz | — | 8.3 g | — |
| Sodyum | 1450 mg | 40 mg | -97.2% |
| Su | 51.8 g | 74.5 g | +43.8% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 7.4 g | 2 g | -73.0% |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 3.1 g | 0.8 g | -74.2% |
| Toplam yağ | 11.8 g | 3 g | -74.6% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.4 g | 0.2 g | -50.0% |
| Toplam Şeker | 1.2 g | 12.5 g | +941.7% |
| Çinko | 3.1 mg | 0.3 mg | -90.3% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Ardahan çeçil peyniri and Sütlü irmik.
Sütlü irmik has less energy per 100 g (115 kcal versus 228.6 kcal).
For measured Toplam Şeker, Ardahan çeçil peyniri has 1.2 g and Sütlü irmik has 12.5 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Ardahan çeçil peyniri 35, Sütlü irmik 23.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.