Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
29.8 kcal
Score
77 / 100
Sivri Biber (Organik/Köy Usulü) has a higher nutrition quality score (77) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
81 vs 29.8(-63.2%)
Score Diff
62 vs 77(+24.2%)
OVERALL WINNER
Sivri Biber (Organik/Köy Usulü)
Higher energy
Araka
Score leader
Sivri Biber (Organik/Köy Usulü)
Nutrient split
16 - 4 (tie: 1)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Araka and Sivri Biber (Organik/Köy Usulü) are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Araka has 81.0 kcal and Sivri Biber (Organik/Köy Usulü) has 29.8 kcal. The difference is 51.2 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 62 and 77. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
21 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Araka | Sivri Biber (Organik/Köy Usulü) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 38 µg | 38 µg | 0.0% |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.266 mg | 0.08 mg | -69.9% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.132 mg | 0.06 mg | -54.5% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.169 mg | 0.28 mg | +65.7% |
| Beta Karoten | — | 450 µg | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 40 mg | 135 mg | +237.5% |
| Demir | 1.47 mg | 0.85 mg | -42.2% |
| Diyet lifi | 5.7 g | 2.1 g | -63.2% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 0.13 mg | — | — |
| Fosfor | 108 mg | 29 mg | -73.1% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 24.8 µg | 14.5 µg | -41.5% |
| Kalsiyum | 25 mg | 15 mg | -40.0% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 14.45 g | 5.9 g | -59.2% |
| Kül | — | 0.7 g | — |
| Lutein + zeaksantin | — | 710 µg | — |
| Magnezyum | 33 mg | 16 mg | -51.5% |
| Niasin | 2.09 mg | 0.95 mg | -54.5% |
| Potasyum | 244 mg | 245 mg | +0.4% |
| Protein | 5.42 g | 1.25 g | -76.9% |
| Sodyum | 5 mg | 4 mg | -20.0% |
| Su | 78.86 g | 91.5 g | +16.0% |
| Toplam Folat | 65 µg | 24 µg | -63.1% |
| Toplam yağ | 0.4 g | 0.35 g | -12.5% |
| Toplam Şeker | 5.67 g | 3.2 g | -43.6% |
| Çinko | 1.24 mg | 0.26 mg | -79.0% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Araka and Sivri Biber (Organik/Köy Usulü).
Sivri Biber (Organik/Köy Usulü) has less energy per 100 g (29.8 kcal versus 81 kcal).
For measured C Vitamini (askorbik asit), Araka has 40 mg and Sivri Biber (Organik/Köy Usulü) has 135 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Araka 62, Sivri Biber (Organik/Köy Usulü) 77.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.