Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
42 kcal
Score
90 / 100
Isırgan Otu has a higher nutrition quality score (90) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
81 vs 42(-48.1%)
Score Diff
62 vs 90(+45.2%)
OVERALL WINNER
Isırgan Otu
Higher energy
Araka
Score leader
Isırgan Otu
Nutrient split
10 - 9 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Araka and Isırgan Otu are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Araka has 81.0 kcal and Isırgan Otu has 42.0 kcal. The difference is 39.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 62 and 90. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
19 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Araka | Isırgan Otu | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 38 µg | 101 µg | +165.8% |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.266 mg | 0.008 mg | -97.0% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.132 mg | 0.16 mg | +21.2% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.169 mg | 0.103 mg | -39.1% |
| Beta Karoten | — | 1150 µg | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 40 mg | 27.2 mg | -32.0% |
| Demir | 1.47 mg | 1.64 mg | +11.6% |
| Diyet lifi | 5.7 g | 6.9 g | +21.1% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 0.13 mg | — | — |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | — | 42 kcal | — |
| Folat DFE | — | 14 µg | — |
| Fosfor | 108 mg | 71 mg | -34.3% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 24.8 µg | 498 µg | +1908.1% |
| Kalsiyum | 25 mg | 481 mg | +1824.0% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 14.45 g | 7.49 g | -48.2% |
| Magnezyum | 33 mg | 57 mg | +72.7% |
| Niasin | 2.09 mg | 0.38 mg | -81.8% |
| Potasyum | 244 mg | 334 mg | +36.9% |
| Protein | 5.42 g | 2.71 g | -50.0% |
| Sodyum | 5 mg | 4 mg | -20.0% |
| Su | 78.86 g | 87.6 g | +11.1% |
| Toplam Folat | 65 µg | — | — |
| Toplam yağ | 0.4 g | 0.11 g | -72.5% |
| Toplam Şeker | 5.67 g | — | — |
| Çinko | 1.24 mg | 0.43 mg | -65.3% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Araka and Isırgan Otu.
Isırgan Otu has less energy per 100 g (42 kcal versus 81 kcal).
For measured K Vitamini (filokinon), Araka has 24.8 µg and Isırgan Otu has 498 µg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Araka 62, Isırgan Otu 90.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.