Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
496 kcal
Score
38 / 100
Süt tozu has a higher nutrition quality score (38) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
405 vs 496(+22.5%)
Score Diff
33 vs 38(+15.2%)
OVERALL WINNER
Süt tozu
Higher energy
Süt tozu
Score leader
Süt tozu
Nutrient split
7 - 11 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Appenzeller peyniri and Süt tozu are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Appenzeller peyniri has 405.0 kcal and Süt tozu has 496.0 kcal. The difference is 91.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 33 and 38. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
18 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Appenzeller peyniri | Süt tozu | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 295 µg | 253 µg | -14.2% |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | — | 0.28 mg | — |
| B12 Vitamini | 1.9 µg | 3.25 µg | +71.1% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.45 mg | 1.21 mg | +168.9% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.12 mg | 0.3 mg | +150.0% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | — | 8.6 mg | — |
| D Vitamini | 0.7 µg | — | — |
| Demir | 0.3 mg | 0.47 mg | +56.7% |
| Diyet lifi | 0 g | — | — |
| Fosfor | 540 mg | 776 mg | +43.7% |
| Kalsiyum | 780 mg | 912 mg | +16.9% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 0.1 g | 38.42 g | +38320.0% |
| Kolesterol | 105 mg | 97 mg | -7.6% |
| Kül | 4 g | 6.09 g | +52.3% |
| Laktoz | — | 38.42 g | — |
| Magnezyum | 32 mg | 85 mg | +165.6% |
| Potasyum | 110 mg | 1330 mg | +1109.1% |
| Protein | 25.5 g | 26.32 g | +3.2% |
| Sodyum | 650 mg | 371 mg | -42.9% |
| Su | 37.2 g | 2.47 g | -93.4% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 20.8 g | 16.74 g | -19.5% |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 9.4 g | — | — |
| Toplam yağ | 33.2 g | 26.71 g | -19.5% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 1.1 g | — | — |
| Toplam Şeker | 0.1 g | — | — |
| Çinko | 4.1 mg | 3.34 mg | -18.5% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Appenzeller peyniri and Süt tozu.
Appenzeller peyniri has less energy per 100 g (405 kcal versus 496 kcal).
For measured Karbonhidrat (farkla), Appenzeller peyniri has 0.1 g and Süt tozu has 38.42 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Appenzeller peyniri 33, Süt tozu 38.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.