Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
345 kcal
Score
6 / 100
Appenzeller peyniri has a higher nutrition quality score (33) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
405 vs 345(-14.8%)
Score Diff
33 vs 6(-81.8%)
OVERALL WINNER
Appenzeller peyniri
Higher energy
Appenzeller peyniri
Score leader
Appenzeller peyniri
Nutrient split
11 - 9 (tie: 1)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Appenzeller peyniri and Süt kreması are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Appenzeller peyniri has 405.0 kcal and Süt kreması has 345.0 kcal. The difference is 60.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 33 and 6. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
21 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Appenzeller peyniri | Süt kreması | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 295 µg | 420 µg | +42.4% |
| B12 Vitamini | 1.9 µg | 0.22 µg | -88.4% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.45 mg | 0.11 mg | -75.6% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.12 mg | — | — |
| D Vitamini | 0.7 µg | 0.6 µg | -14.3% |
| Demir | 0.3 mg | — | — |
| Diyet lifi | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | — | 1.05 mg | — |
| Fosfor | 540 mg | 62 mg | -88.5% |
| Kalsiyum | 780 mg | 66 mg | -91.5% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 0.1 g | 2.8 g | +2700.0% |
| Kolesterol | 105 mg | 137 mg | +30.5% |
| Kül | 4 g | 0.5 g | -87.5% |
| Laktoz | — | 2.8 g | — |
| Magnezyum | 32 mg | 7 mg | -78.1% |
| Potasyum | 110 mg | 75 mg | -31.8% |
| Protein | 25.5 g | 2.1 g | -91.8% |
| Retinol | — | 410 µg | — |
| Sodyum | 650 mg | 38 mg | -94.2% |
| Su | 37.2 g | 57.7 g | +55.1% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 20.8 g | 23 g | +10.6% |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 9.4 g | 10.7 g | +13.8% |
| Toplam yağ | 33.2 g | 36.1 g | +8.7% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 1.1 g | 1.4 g | +27.3% |
| Toplam Şeker | 0.1 g | 2.8 g | +2700.0% |
| Çinko | 4.1 mg | 0.24 mg | -94.1% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Appenzeller peyniri and Süt kreması.
Süt kreması has less energy per 100 g (345 kcal versus 405 kcal).
For measured Karbonhidrat (farkla), Appenzeller peyniri has 0.1 g and Süt kreması has 2.8 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Appenzeller peyniri 33, Süt kreması 6.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.