Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
115 kcal
Score
23 / 100
Antep peyniri has a higher nutrition quality score (32) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
292 vs 115(-60.6%)
Score Diff
32 vs 23(-28.1%)
OVERALL WINNER
Antep peyniri
Higher energy
Antep peyniri
Score leader
Antep peyniri
Nutrient split
15 - 6 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Antep peyniri and Sütlü irmik are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Antep peyniri has 292.0 kcal and Sütlü irmik has 115.0 kcal. The difference is 177.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 32 and 23. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
21 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Antep peyniri | Sütlü irmik | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 195 µg | 40 µg | -79.5% |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | — | 0.03 mg | — |
| B12 Vitamini | 1.45 µg | 0.35 µg | -75.9% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.36 mg | 0.15 mg | -58.3% |
| D Vitamini | — | 0.5 µg | — |
| Demir | 0.42 mg | 0.1 mg | -76.2% |
| Diyet lifi | 0 g | 0.5 g | — |
| Enerji | 1221 kj | — | — |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | — | 115 kcal | — |
| Folat DFE | — | 4 µg | — |
| Fosfor | 450 mg | 75 mg | -83.3% |
| Kalsiyum | 680 mg | 100 mg | -85.3% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 1.8 g | 18.5 g | +927.8% |
| Kolesterol | 72 mg | 9 mg | -87.5% |
| Kül | 6.7 g | — | — |
| Laktoz | 1.2 g | 4 g | +233.3% |
| Magnezyum | 25 mg | 8 mg | -68.0% |
| Potasyum | 115 mg | 125 mg | +8.7% |
| Protein | 21.5 g | 3.8 g | -82.3% |
| Retinol | 190 µg | — | — |
| Sakkaroz | — | 8.3 g | — |
| Sodyum | 1250 mg | 40 mg | -96.8% |
| Su | 48 g | 74.5 g | +55.2% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 13.8 g | 2 g | -85.5% |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 5.8 g | 0.8 g | -86.2% |
| Toplam yağ | 22 g | 3 g | -86.4% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.85 g | 0.2 g | -76.5% |
| Toplam Şeker | 1.2 g | 12.5 g | +941.7% |
| Çinko | 3.2 mg | 0.3 mg | -90.6% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Antep peyniri and Sütlü irmik.
Sütlü irmik has less energy per 100 g (115 kcal versus 292 kcal).
For measured Toplam Şeker, Antep peyniri has 1.2 g and Sütlü irmik has 12.5 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Antep peyniri 32, Sütlü irmik 23.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.