Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
496 kcal
Score
38 / 100
Süt tozu has a higher nutrition quality score (38) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
292 vs 496(+69.9%)
Score Diff
32 vs 38(+18.8%)
OVERALL WINNER
Süt tozu
Higher energy
Süt tozu
Score leader
Süt tozu
Nutrient split
3 - 15 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Antep peyniri and Süt tozu are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Antep peyniri has 292.0 kcal and Süt tozu has 496.0 kcal. The difference is 204.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 32 and 38. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
18 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Antep peyniri | Süt tozu | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 195 µg | 253 µg | +29.7% |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | — | 0.28 mg | — |
| B12 Vitamini | 1.45 µg | 3.25 µg | +124.1% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.36 mg | 1.21 mg | +236.1% |
| B6 Vitamini | — | 0.3 mg | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | — | 8.6 mg | — |
| Demir | 0.42 mg | 0.47 mg | +11.9% |
| Diyet lifi | 0 g | — | — |
| Enerji | 1221 kj | — | — |
| Fosfor | 450 mg | 776 mg | +72.4% |
| Kalsiyum | 680 mg | 912 mg | +34.1% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 1.8 g | 38.42 g | +2034.4% |
| Kolesterol | 72 mg | 97 mg | +34.7% |
| Kül | 6.7 g | 6.09 g | -9.1% |
| Laktoz | 1.2 g | 38.42 g | +3101.7% |
| Magnezyum | 25 mg | 85 mg | +240.0% |
| Potasyum | 115 mg | 1330 mg | +1056.5% |
| Protein | 21.5 g | 26.32 g | +22.4% |
| Retinol | 190 µg | — | — |
| Sodyum | 1250 mg | 371 mg | -70.3% |
| Su | 48 g | 2.47 g | -94.9% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 13.8 g | 16.74 g | +21.3% |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 5.8 g | — | — |
| Toplam yağ | 22 g | 26.71 g | +21.4% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.85 g | — | — |
| Toplam Şeker | 1.2 g | — | — |
| Çinko | 3.2 mg | 3.34 mg | +4.4% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Antep peyniri and Süt tozu.
Antep peyniri has less energy per 100 g (292 kcal versus 496 kcal).
For measured Laktoz, Antep peyniri has 1.2 g and Süt tozu has 38.42 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Antep peyniri 32, Süt tozu 38.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.