Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
486 kcal
Score
38 / 100
Chia Tohumu, Kuru has a higher nutrition quality score (38) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
562 vs 486(-13.5%)
Score Diff
18 vs 38(+111.1%)
OVERALL WINNER
Chia Tohumu, Kuru
Higher energy
Antep Fıstığı (Çiğ)
Score leader
Chia Tohumu, Kuru
Nutrient split
6 - 11 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Antep Fıstığı (Çiğ) and Chia Tohumu, Kuru are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Antep Fıstığı (Çiğ) has 562.0 kcal and Chia Tohumu, Kuru has 486.0 kcal. The difference is 76.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 18 and 38. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
17 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Antep Fıstığı (Çiğ) | Chia Tohumu, Kuru | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (IU) | — | 54 iu | — |
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 26 µg | — | — |
| ALA (18:3 n-3) | — | 17.83 g | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.87 mg | 0.62 mg | -28.7% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.16 mg | 0.17 mg | +6.3% |
| B6 Vitamini | 1.7 mg | — | — |
| Bakir | 1.3 mg | — | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 5.6 mg | 1.6 mg | -71.4% |
| Demir | 3.92 mg | 7.72 mg | +96.9% |
| Diyet lifi | 10.6 g | 34.4 g | +224.5% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 2.3 mg | 0.5 mg | -78.3% |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | — | 486 kcal | — |
| Folat DFE | 51 µg | — | — |
| Fosfor | 490 mg | 860 mg | +75.5% |
| Kalsiyum | 105 mg | 631 mg | +501.0% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 27.17 g | 42.12 g | +55.0% |
| Magnezyum | 121 mg | 335 mg | +176.9% |
| Mangan | 1.2 mg | — | — |
| Niasin | 1.3 mg | 8.83 mg | +579.2% |
| Potasyum | 1025 mg | 407 mg | -60.3% |
| Protein | 20.16 g | 16.54 g | -18.0% |
| Sodyum | 1 mg | 16 mg | +1500.0% |
| Su | 4.37 g | 5.8 g | +32.7% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | — | 3.33 g | — |
| Toplam Folat | — | 49 µg | — |
| Toplam yağ | 45.32 g | 30.74 g | -32.2% |
| Toplam Şeker | 7.66 g | — | — |
| Çinko | 2.2 mg | 4.58 mg | +108.2% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Antep Fıstığı (Çiğ) and Chia Tohumu, Kuru.
Chia Tohumu, Kuru has less energy per 100 g (486 kcal versus 562 kcal).
For measured Sodyum, Antep Fıstığı (Çiğ) has 1 mg and Chia Tohumu, Kuru has 16 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Antep Fıstığı (Çiğ) 18, Chia Tohumu, Kuru 38.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.