Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
526 kcal
Score
55 / 100
Susam unu has a higher nutrition quality score (55) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
572 vs 526(-8.0%)
Score Diff
17 vs 55(+223.5%)
OVERALL WINNER
Susam unu
Higher energy
Antep Fıstığı (Boz Kavlak)
Score leader
Susam unu
Nutrient split
8 - 12 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Antep Fıstığı (Boz Kavlak) and Susam unu are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Antep Fıstığı (Boz Kavlak) has 572.0 kcal and Susam unu has 526.0 kcal. The difference is 46.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 17 and 55. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
20 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Antep Fıstığı (Boz Kavlak) | Susam unu | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.87 mg | 1.22 mg | +40.2% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | — | 0.35 mg | — |
| B6 Vitamini | 1.7 mg | 0.79 mg | -53.5% |
| Bakir | 1.3 mg | 2.47 mg | +90.0% |
| Demir | 3.9 mg | 14.6 mg | +274.4% |
| Diyet lifi | 10.3 g | 10 g | -2.9% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 2.8 mg | — | — |
| Fosfor | 490 mg | 774 mg | +58.0% |
| Kalsiyum | 105 mg | 153 mg | +45.7% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 23.4 g | 10.7 g | -54.3% |
| Kül | 3 g | 6.9 g | +130.0% |
| Lutein + zeaksantin | 2900 µg | — | — |
| Magnezyum | 121 mg | 362 mg | +199.2% |
| Mangan | — | 2.46 mg | — |
| Niasin | — | 5.44 mg | — |
| Potasyum | 1025 mg | 456 mg | -55.5% |
| Protein | 20.6 g | 50.4 g | +144.7% |
| Selenyum | — | 5.7 µg | — |
| Sodyum | 1 mg | 39 mg | +3800.0% |
| Su | 4.5 g | 6.8 g | +51.1% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 5.8 g | 4.58 g | -21.0% |
| Toplam Folat | 51 µg | 97 µg | +90.2% |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 24.5 g | 12.2 g | -50.2% |
| Toplam yağ | 48.5 g | 32.2 g | -33.6% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 14.3 g | 13.9 g | -2.8% |
| Toplam Şeker | 7.5 g | — | — |
| Çinko | 2.2 mg | 10.7 mg | +386.4% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Antep Fıstığı (Boz Kavlak) and Susam unu.
Susam unu has less energy per 100 g (526 kcal versus 572 kcal).
For measured Sodyum, Antep Fıstığı (Boz Kavlak) has 1 mg and Susam unu has 39 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Antep Fıstığı (Boz Kavlak) 17, Susam unu 55.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.