Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
588 kcal
Score
27 / 100
Kaju Ezmesi has a higher nutrition quality score (27) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
572 vs 588(+2.8%)
Score Diff
17 vs 27(+58.8%)
OVERALL WINNER
Kaju Ezmesi
Higher energy
Kaju Ezmesi
Score leader
Kaju Ezmesi
Nutrient split
8 - 9 (tie: 1)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Antep Fıstığı (Boz Kavlak) and Kaju Ezmesi are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Antep Fıstığı (Boz Kavlak) has 572.0 kcal and Kaju Ezmesi has 588.0 kcal. The difference is 16.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 17 and 27. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
18 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Antep Fıstığı (Boz Kavlak) | Kaju Ezmesi | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.87 mg | 0.4 mg | -54.0% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | — | 0.2 mg | — |
| B6 Vitamini | 1.7 mg | 0.3 mg | -82.4% |
| Bakir | 1.3 mg | 2.2 mg | +69.2% |
| Demir | 3.9 mg | 5 mg | +28.2% |
| Diyet lifi | 10.3 g | 2 g | -80.6% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 2.8 mg | — | — |
| Fosfor | 490 mg | 490 mg | 0.0% |
| Kalsiyum | 105 mg | 43 mg | -59.0% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 23.4 g | 26.6 g | +13.7% |
| Kül | 3 g | — | — |
| Lutein + zeaksantin | 2900 µg | — | — |
| Magnezyum | 121 mg | 258 mg | +113.2% |
| Mangan | — | 0.8 mg | — |
| Niasin | — | 1.4 mg | — |
| Potasyum | 1025 mg | 560 mg | -45.4% |
| Protein | 20.6 g | 17.5 g | -15.0% |
| Selenyum | — | 11.5 µg | — |
| Sodyum | 1 mg | 15 mg | +1400.0% |
| Su | 4.5 g | — | — |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 5.8 g | 9.5 g | +63.8% |
| Toplam Folat | 51 µg | — | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 24.5 g | 27.3 g | +11.4% |
| Toplam yağ | 48.5 g | 49.4 g | +1.9% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 14.3 g | 7.8 g | -45.5% |
| Toplam Şeker | 7.5 g | 6.4 g | -14.7% |
| Çinko | 2.2 mg | 5.6 mg | +154.5% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Antep Fıstığı (Boz Kavlak) and Kaju Ezmesi.
Antep Fıstığı (Boz Kavlak) has less energy per 100 g (572 kcal versus 588 kcal).
For measured Sodyum, Antep Fıstığı (Boz Kavlak) has 1 mg and Kaju Ezmesi has 15 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Antep Fıstığı (Boz Kavlak) 17, Kaju Ezmesi 27.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.