Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
717 kcal
Score
— / 100
At least one nutrition score lacks comparable measurements, so no overall winner is assigned.
Energy Diff
204.8 vs 717(+250.1%)
Score Diff
38 vs —
Higher energy
Köy Tereyağı
Score leader
Insufficient data
Nutrient split
9 - 4 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Antakya Sürk Peyniri (Çökelek) and Köy Tereyağı are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Antakya Sürk Peyniri (Çökelek) has 204.8 kcal and Köy Tereyağı has 717.0 kcal. The difference is 512.2 kcal.
There are not enough comparable micronutrient measurements for a score comparison.
13 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Antakya Sürk Peyniri (Çökelek) | Köy Tereyağı | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (IU) | — | 2499 iu | — |
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 95 µg | 684 µg | +620.0% |
| B12 Vitamini | 0.85 µg | — | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.28 mg | 0.034 mg | -87.9% |
| Beta Karoten | 420 µg | — | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 3.2 mg | — | — |
| D Vitamini (IU) | — | 60 iu | — |
| Demir | 1.8 mg | — | — |
| Diyet lifi | 1.8 g | — | — |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | — | 2.32 mg | — |
| Fosfor | 380 mg | 24 mg | -93.7% |
| Kalsiyum | 450 mg | 24 mg | -94.7% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 4.5 g | 0.06 g | -98.7% |
| Kolesterol | 35 mg | 215 mg | +514.3% |
| Kül | 6.8 g | 0.09 g | -98.7% |
| Magnezyum | 32 mg | — | — |
| MUFA 18:1 (oleik asit) | — | 19.9 g | — |
| Potasyum | 210 mg | 24 mg | -88.6% |
| Protein | 21.5 g | 0.85 g | -96.0% |
| SFA 16:0 (palmitik asit) | — | 21.5 g | — |
| SFA 4:0 (butirik asit) | — | 3.2 g | — |
| Sodyum | 1650 mg | 11 mg | -99.3% |
| Su | 48 g | 17.94 g | -62.6% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 6.8 g | 51.37 g | +655.4% |
| Toplam Kolin | — | 18.8 mg | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | — | 21.02 g | — |
| Toplam yağ | 11.2 g | 81.11 g | +624.2% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | — | 3.04 g | — |
| Toplam Şeker | 1.6 g | — | — |
| Çinko | 2.4 mg | — | — |
Scientific answers to key differences between Antakya Sürk Peyniri (Çökelek) and Köy Tereyağı.
Antakya Sürk Peyniri (Çökelek) has less energy per 100 g (204.8 kcal versus 717 kcal).
For measured Toplam doymus yağ asitleri, Antakya Sürk Peyniri (Çökelek) has 6.8 g and Köy Tereyağı has 51.37 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Antakya Sürk Peyniri (Çökelek) 38, Köy Tereyağı —.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.