Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
139 kcal
Score
33 / 100
Anasazi fasulyesi has a higher nutrition quality score (38) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
337 vs 139(-58.8%)
Score Diff
38 vs 33(-13.2%)
OVERALL WINNER
Anasazi fasulyesi
Higher energy
Anasazi fasulyesi
Score leader
Anasazi fasulyesi
Nutrient split
19 - 1 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Anasazi fasulyesi and Barbunya are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Anasazi fasulyesi has 337.0 kcal and Barbunya has 139.0 kcal. The difference is 198.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 38 and 33. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
20 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Anasazi fasulyesi | Barbunya | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.7 mg | 0.16 mg | -77.1% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.2 mg | 0.06 mg | -70.0% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.4 mg | 0.14 mg | -65.0% |
| Bakir | 0.8 mg | 0.24 mg | -70.0% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | — | 1.2 mg | — |
| Demir | 5.1 mg | 2.1 mg | -58.8% |
| Diyet lifi | 15.2 g | 8.6 g | -43.4% |
| Fosfor | 410 mg | 142 mg | -65.4% |
| Kalsiyum | 135 mg | 46 mg | -65.9% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 61.3 g | 24.8 g | -59.5% |
| Kül | 4.2 g | — | — |
| Magnezyum | 170 mg | 51 mg | -70.0% |
| Mangan | 1.1 mg | 0.46 mg | -58.2% |
| Niasin | 2.1 mg | 0.58 mg | -72.4% |
| Potasyum | 1360 mg | 395 mg | -71.0% |
| Protein | 21.5 g | 9.3 g | -56.7% |
| Selenyum | 12.8 µg | 1.2 µg | -90.6% |
| Sodyum | 12 mg | 2 mg | -83.3% |
| Su | 11.8 g | 63.5 g | +438.1% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | — | 0.12 g | — |
| Toplam Folat | 525 µg | 132 µg | -74.9% |
| Toplam yağ | 1.2 g | 0.65 g | -45.8% |
| Toplam Şeker | — | 0.6 g | — |
| Çinko | 2.8 mg | 1.15 mg | -58.9% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Anasazi fasulyesi and Barbunya.
Barbunya has less energy per 100 g (139 kcal versus 337 kcal).
For measured Su, Anasazi fasulyesi has 11.8 g and Barbunya has 63.5 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Anasazi fasulyesi 38, Barbunya 33.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.