Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
358 kcal
Score
6 / 100
Anasazi fasulyesi has a higher nutrition quality score (38) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
337 vs 358(+6.2%)
Score Diff
38 vs 6(-84.2%)
OVERALL WINNER
Anasazi fasulyesi
Higher energy
Baldo Pirinç
Score leader
Anasazi fasulyesi
Nutrient split
19 - 2 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Anasazi fasulyesi and Baldo Pirinç are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Anasazi fasulyesi has 337.0 kcal and Baldo Pirinç has 358.0 kcal. The difference is 21.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 38 and 6. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
21 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Anasazi fasulyesi | Baldo Pirinç | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.7 mg | 0.07 mg | -90.0% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.2 mg | 0.03 mg | -85.0% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.4 mg | 0.16 mg | -60.0% |
| Bakir | 0.8 mg | 0.14 mg | -82.5% |
| Demir | 5.1 mg | 0.8 mg | -84.3% |
| Diyet lifi | 15.2 g | 1.3 g | -91.4% |
| Fosfor | 410 mg | 98 mg | -76.1% |
| Kalsiyum | 135 mg | 9 mg | -93.3% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 61.3 g | 78.9 g | +28.7% |
| Kül | 4.2 g | 0.55 g | -86.9% |
| Magnezyum | 170 mg | 23 mg | -86.5% |
| Mangan | 1.1 mg | 1.05 mg | -4.5% |
| Niasin | 2.1 mg | 1.62 mg | -22.9% |
| Nisasta | — | 77.2 g | — |
| Pantotenik asit | — | 0.63 mg | — |
| Potasyum | 1360 mg | 115 mg | -91.5% |
| Protein | 21.5 g | 6.7 g | -68.8% |
| Selenyum | 12.8 µg | 9.5 µg | -25.8% |
| Sodyum | 12 mg | 3 mg | -75.0% |
| Su | 11.8 g | 12.8 g | +8.5% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | — | 0.18 g | — |
| Toplam Folat | 525 µg | 8 µg | -98.5% |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | — | 0.21 g | — |
| Toplam yağ | 1.2 g | 0.65 g | -45.8% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | — | 0.2 g | — |
| Toplam Şeker | — | 0.12 g | — |
| Çinko | 2.8 mg | 1.09 mg | -61.1% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Anasazi fasulyesi and Baldo Pirinç.
Anasazi fasulyesi has less energy per 100 g (337 kcal versus 358 kcal).
For measured Toplam Folat, Anasazi fasulyesi has 525 µg and Baldo Pirinç has 8 µg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Anasazi fasulyesi 38, Baldo Pirinç 6.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.