Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
125.4 kcal
Score
51 / 100
Arsik has a higher nutrition quality score (51) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
438.5 vs 125.4(-71.4%)
Score Diff
8 vs 51(+537.5%)
OVERALL WINNER
Arsik
Higher energy
Anarsa
Score leader
Arsik
Nutrient split
9 - 8 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Anarsa and Arsik are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Anarsa has 438.5 kcal and Arsik has 125.4 kcal. The difference is 313.1 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 8 and 51. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
17 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Anarsa | Arsik | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | — | 28 µg | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.08 mg | — | — |
| B12 Vitamini | — | 1.45 µg | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.05 mg | — | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | — | 4.8 mg | — |
| Demir | 2.15 mg | 1.2 mg | -44.2% |
| Diyet lifi | 2.4 g | 0.8 g | -66.7% |
| Fosfor | 115 mg | 185 mg | +60.9% |
| Kalsiyum | 92 mg | 48 mg | -47.8% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 68.5 g | 3.1 g | -95.5% |
| Kolesterol | — | 55 mg | — |
| Kül | 1 g | 1.4 g | +40.0% |
| Magnezyum | 42 mg | 29 mg | -31.0% |
| Niasin | 1.25 mg | 2.3 mg | +84.0% |
| Potasyum | 138 mg | 325 mg | +135.5% |
| Protein | 4.6 g | 16.5 g | +258.7% |
| Selenyum | — | 14.8 µg | — |
| Sodyum | 14 mg | 340 mg | +2328.6% |
| Su | 7.3 g | 73.2 g | +902.7% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 6.1 g | 1.15 g | -81.1% |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 5.7 g | 2.1 g | -63.2% |
| Toplam yağ | 16.2 g | 5.2 g | -67.9% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 3.4 g | 1.45 g | -57.4% |
| Toplam Şeker | 31.8 g | — | — |
| Çinko | 0.85 mg | 1.3 mg | +52.9% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Anarsa and Arsik.
Arsik has less energy per 100 g (125.4 kcal versus 438.5 kcal).
For measured Sodyum, Anarsa has 14 mg and Arsik has 340 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Anarsa 8, Arsik 51.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Anarsa · Arsik · Methodology
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.