Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
148.5 kcal
Score
34 / 100
Zeytinyağlı biber dolması has a higher nutrition quality score (34) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
125 vs 148.5(+18.8%)
Score Diff
26 vs 34(+30.8%)
OVERALL WINNER
Zeytinyağlı biber dolması
Higher energy
Zeytinyağlı biber dolması
Score leader
Zeytinyağlı biber dolması
Nutrient split
13 - 5 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Analı kızlı and Zeytinyağlı biber dolması are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Analı kızlı has 125.0 kcal and Zeytinyağlı biber dolması has 148.5 kcal. The difference is 23.5 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 26 and 34. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
18 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Analı kızlı | Zeytinyağlı biber dolması | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 28 µg | 26 µg | -7.1% |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.11 mg | 0.075 mg | -31.8% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.08 mg | — | — |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.14 mg | — | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 2.6 mg | 36.5 mg | +1303.8% |
| Demir | 1.45 mg | 1.15 mg | -20.7% |
| Diyet lifi | 2.3 g | 2.2 g | -4.3% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | — | 1.35 mg | — |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | — | 148.5 kcal | — |
| Folat DFE | — | 23.5 µg | — |
| Fosfor | 78 mg | 41 mg | -47.4% |
| Kalsiyum | 24 mg | 26 mg | +8.3% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 14.2 g | 18.3 g | +28.9% |
| Kolesterol | 12 mg | — | — |
| Kül | 1.2 g | — | — |
| Magnezyum | 26 mg | 18.5 mg | -28.8% |
| Niasin | 1.65 mg | — | — |
| Potasyum | 220 mg | 210 mg | -4.5% |
| Protein | 5.6 g | 2.1 g | -62.5% |
| Sodyum | 325 mg | 285 mg | -12.3% |
| Su | 76.2 g | 72.8 g | -4.5% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 1.75 g | 1.08 g | -38.3% |
| Toplam Folat | 34 µg | — | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 2.15 g | 5.25 g | +144.2% |
| Toplam yağ | 5.1 g | 7.4 g | +45.1% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.82 g | 0.78 g | -4.9% |
| Toplam Şeker | — | 2.4 g | — |
| Çinko | 1.12 mg | 0.42 mg | -62.5% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Analı kızlı and Zeytinyağlı biber dolması.
Analı kızlı has less energy per 100 g (125 kcal versus 148.5 kcal).
For measured C Vitamini (askorbik asit), Analı kızlı has 2.6 mg and Zeytinyağlı biber dolması has 36.5 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Analı kızlı 26, Zeytinyağlı biber dolması 34.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.