Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
195.7 kcal
Score
21 / 100
Analı kızlı has a higher nutrition quality score (26) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
125 vs 195.7(+56.6%)
Score Diff
26 vs 21(-19.2%)
OVERALL WINNER
Analı kızlı
Higher energy
Sıkma Köfte
Score leader
Analı kızlı
Nutrient split
5 - 13 (tie: 1)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Analı kızlı and Sıkma Köfte are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Analı kızlı has 125.0 kcal and Sıkma Köfte has 195.7 kcal. The difference is 70.7 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 26 and 21. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
19 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Analı kızlı | Sıkma Köfte | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 28 µg | — | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.11 mg | 0.14 mg | +27.3% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.08 mg | 0.08 mg | 0.0% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.14 mg | — | — |
| Beta Karoten | — | 310 µg | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 2.6 mg | 5.5 mg | +111.5% |
| Demir | 1.45 mg | 1.8 mg | +24.1% |
| Diyet lifi | 2.3 g | 4.2 g | +82.6% |
| Folat DFE | — | 32 µg | — |
| Fosfor | 78 mg | 105 mg | +34.6% |
| Kalsiyum | 24 mg | 28 mg | +16.7% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 14.2 g | 29.5 g | +107.7% |
| Kolesterol | 12 mg | — | — |
| Kül | 1.2 g | — | — |
| Magnezyum | 26 mg | 38 mg | +46.2% |
| Niasin | 1.65 mg | 1.4 mg | -15.2% |
| Potasyum | 220 mg | 280 mg | +27.3% |
| Protein | 5.6 g | 4.8 g | -14.3% |
| Sodyum | 325 mg | 380 mg | +16.9% |
| Su | 76.2 g | 56.8 g | -25.5% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 1.75 g | 0.95 g | -45.7% |
| Toplam Folat | 34 µg | — | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 2.15 g | 4.2 g | +95.3% |
| Toplam yağ | 5.1 g | 6.5 g | +27.5% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.82 g | 1.1 g | +34.1% |
| Toplam Şeker | — | 1.8 g | — |
| Çinko | 1.12 mg | 0.95 mg | -15.2% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Analı kızlı and Sıkma Köfte.
Analı kızlı has less energy per 100 g (125 kcal versus 195.7 kcal).
For measured C Vitamini (askorbik asit), Analı kızlı has 2.6 mg and Sıkma Köfte has 5.5 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Analı kızlı 26, Sıkma Köfte 21.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.