Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
344 kcal
Score
23 / 100
Taameya has a higher nutrition quality score (23) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
275 vs 344(+25.1%)
Score Diff
14 vs 23(+64.3%)
OVERALL WINNER
Taameya
Higher energy
Taameya
Score leader
Taameya
Nutrient split
4 - 15 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Amritsari kulcha and Taameya are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Amritsari kulcha has 275.0 kcal and Taameya has 344.0 kcal. The difference is 69.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 14 and 23. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
19 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Amritsari kulcha | Taameya | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 35 µg | — | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.22 mg | 0.32 mg | +45.5% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.15 mg | 0.18 mg | +20.0% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.18 mg | 0.22 mg | +22.2% |
| Bakir | — | 0.45 mg | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 6.5 mg | 4.5 mg | -30.8% |
| Demir | 2.1 mg | 3.8 mg | +81.0% |
| Diyet lifi | 2.8 g | 9.2 g | +228.6% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | — | 2.6 mg | — |
| Folat DFE | 45 µg | 115 µg | +155.6% |
| Fosfor | 110 mg | 210 mg | +90.9% |
| Kalsiyum | 45 mg | 75 mg | +66.7% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 38.5 g | 32.5 g | -15.6% |
| Kül | 1.5 g | 2.5 g | +66.7% |
| Magnezyum | 28 mg | 82 mg | +192.9% |
| Mangan | — | 0.65 mg | — |
| Niasin | 2.1 mg | 1.6 mg | -23.8% |
| Potasyum | 210 mg | 580 mg | +176.2% |
| Protein | 6.5 g | 13.5 g | +107.7% |
| Sodyum | 480 mg | 540 mg | +12.5% |
| Su | 40.2 g | 34.5 g | -14.2% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 5.2 g | — | — |
| Toplam yağ | 10.5 g | 17.8 g | +69.5% |
| Toplam Şeker | 1.8 g | — | — |
| Çinko | 0.8 mg | 1.9 mg | +137.5% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Amritsari kulcha and Taameya.
Amritsari kulcha has less energy per 100 g (275 kcal versus 344 kcal).
For measured Diyet lifi, Amritsari kulcha has 2.8 g and Taameya has 9.2 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Amritsari kulcha 14, Taameya 23.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.