Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Energy
44 kcal
Score
56 / 100
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Amla (Hint Bektaşi Üzümü), Çiğ has a higher nutrition quality score (56) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
44 vs 83(+88.6%)
Score Diff
56 vs 29(-48.2%)
OVERALL WINNER
Amla (Hint Bektaşi Üzümü), Çiğ
Higher energy
Nar
Score leader
Amla (Hint Bektaşi Üzümü), Çiğ
Nutrient split
6 - 12 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Amla (Hint Bektaşi Üzümü), Çiğ and Nar are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Amla (Hint Bektaşi Üzümü), Çiğ has 44.0 kcal and Nar has 83.0 kcal. The difference is 39.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 56 and 29. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
18 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Amla (Hint Bektaşi Üzümü), Çiğ | Nar | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 15 µg | — | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.03 mg | 0.067 mg | +123.3% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.04 mg | 0.053 mg | +32.5% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.08 mg | 0.075 mg | -6.3% |
| Bakir | 0.015 mg | — | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 445 mg | 10.2 mg | -97.7% |
| Demir | 1.2 mg | 0.3 mg | -75.0% |
| Diyet lifi | 4.3 g | 4 g | -7.0% |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | 44 kcal | — | — |
| Folat DFE | 6 µg | 38 µg | +533.3% |
| Fosfor | 27 mg | 36 mg | +33.3% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | — | 16.4 µg | — |
| Kalsiyum | 25 mg | 10 mg | -60.0% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 10.18 g | 18.7 g | +83.7% |
| Kül | 0.5 g | — | — |
| Magnezyum | 10 mg | 12 mg | +20.0% |
| Mangan | 0.14 mg | — | — |
| Niasin | 0.15 mg | 0.293 mg | +95.3% |
| Potasyum | 198 mg | 236 mg | +19.2% |
| Protein | 0.88 g | 1.67 g | +89.8% |
| Sodyum | 1 mg | 3 mg | +200.0% |
| Su | 86.1 g | 77.93 g | -9.5% |
| Toplam yağ | 0.58 g | 1.17 g | +101.7% |
| Toplam Şeker | — | 13.67 g | — |
| Çinko | 0.12 mg | 0.35 mg | +191.7% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Amla (Hint Bektaşi Üzümü), Çiğ and Nar.
Amla (Hint Bektaşi Üzümü), Çiğ has less energy per 100 g (44 kcal versus 83 kcal).
For measured Folat DFE, Amla (Hint Bektaşi Üzümü), Çiğ has 6 µg and Nar has 38 µg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Amla (Hint Bektaşi Üzümü), Çiğ 56, Nar 29.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.