Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
357.2 kcal
Score
20 / 100
Edamame Tane, Çiğ has a higher nutrition quality score (41) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
371 vs 357.2(-3.7%)
Score Diff
41 vs 20(-51.2%)
OVERALL WINNER
Edamame Tane, Çiğ
Higher energy
Edamame Tane, Çiğ
Score leader
Edamame Tane, Çiğ
Nutrient split
16 - 5 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Edamame Tane, Çiğ and Arpa Unu are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Edamame Tane, Çiğ has 371.0 kcal and Arpa Unu has 357.2 kcal. The difference is 13.8 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 41 and 20. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
21 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Edamame Tane, Çiğ | Arpa Unu | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (IU) | 2 iu | — | — |
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 0 µg | — | — |
| ALA (18:3 n-3) | 0.04 g | — | — |
| Alanin | 0.8 g | — | — |
| Alfa Karoten | 0 µg | — | — |
| Alfa tokotrienol | 0 mg | — | — |
| Arjinin | 1.06 g | — | — |
| Aspartik asit | 1.26 g | — | — |
| Azot | — | 1.5 g | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.12 mg | 0.23 mg | +91.7% |
| B12 Vitamini | 0 µg | — | — |
| B12 Vitamini (eklenmiş) | 0 µg | — | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.2 mg | 0.15 mg | -25.0% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.59 mg | 0.2 mg | -66.1% |
| Bakir | 0.53 mg | 0.39 mg | -26.4% |
| Besin folati | 82 µg | — | — |
| Beta Karoten | 1 µg | — | — |
| Beta kriptoksantin | 0 µg | — | — |
| Beta tokoferol | 0.96 mg | — | — |
| Beta tokotrienol | 0.48 mg | — | — |
| Beta-glukan | — | 4.2 g | — |
| Betain | 67.6 mg | — | — |
| Biyotin | — | 8.61 µg | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 4.2 mg | — | — |
| D Vitamini | 0 µg | — | — |
| D Vitamini (IU) | 0 iu | — | — |
| Delta tokoferol | 0.69 mg | — | — |
| Delta tokotrienol | 0 mg | — | — |
| Demir | 7.61 mg | 3.3 mg | -56.6% |
| Diyet lifi | 6.7 g | 12.79 g | +90.9% |
| Düşük molekül ağırlıklı diyet lifi | — | 2.31 g | — |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 1.19 mg | — | — |
| Enerji | 371 kj | — | — |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | — | 366.53 kcal | — |
| Enerji (Atwater Özel Faktörleri) | — | 357.19 kcal | — |
| Etil alkol | 0 g | — | — |
| Fenilalanin | 0.54 g | — | — |
| Fitosteroller | 24 mg | — | — |
| Folat DFE | 82 µg | — | — |
| Folik asit | 0 µg | — | — |
| Fosfor | 557 mg | 234.4 mg | -57.9% |
| Fruktoz | 0.01 g | — | — |
| Galaktoz | 0 g | — | — |
| Gama tokoferol | 0.19 mg | — | — |
| Gama tokotrienol | 0.29 mg | — | — |
| Glikoz | 0.27 g | — | — |
| Glisin | 1.64 g | — | — |
| Glutamik asit | 2.26 g | — | — |
| Histidin | 0.39 g | — | — |
| Izolosin | 0.58 g | — | — |
| K Vitamini (dihidrofilokinon) | 0 µg | — | — |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 0 µg | — | — |
| K Vitamini (menakinon-4) | 0 µg | — | — |
| Kalsiyum | 159 mg | 35.56 mg | -77.6% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 65.25 g | 77.4 g | +18.6% |
| Kolesterol | 0 mg | — | — |
| Kül | 2.88 g | 1.53 g | -46.9% |
| Laktoz | 0 g | — | — |
| Likopen | 0 µg | — | — |
| Lizin | 0.75 g | — | — |
| Losin | 0.88 g | — | — |
| Lutein + zeaksantin | 28 µg | — | — |
| Magnezyum | 248 mg | 88.04 mg | -64.5% |
| Maltoz | 0.01 g | — | — |
| Mangan | 3.33 mg | 1.18 mg | -64.6% |
| Metiyonin | 0.23 g | — | — |
| Molibden | — | 57.36 µg | — |
| MUFA 14:1 | 0 g | — | — |
| MUFA 15:1 | 0 g | — | — |
| MUFA 16:1 | 0 g | — | — |
| MUFA 17:1 | 0 g | — | — |
| MUFA 18:1 (oleik asit) | 1.67 g | — | — |
| MUFA 20:1 | 0.01 g | — | — |
| Niasin | 0.92 mg | 5.94 mg | +545.7% |
| Nisasta | 57.27 g | 56.86 g | -0.7% |
| Pantotenik asit | 1.46 mg | — | — |
| Potasyum | 508 mg | 366.6 mg | -27.8% |
| Prolin | 0.7 g | — | — |
| Protein | 13.56 g | 8.72 g | -35.7% |
| PUFA 18:2 (linoleik asit) | 2.74 g | — | — |
| PUFA 18:3 | 0.04 g | — | — |
| PUFA 18:3 n-6 | 0 g | — | — |
| PUFA 20:2 n-6 | 0 g | — | — |
| PUFA 20:3 | 0 g | — | — |
| PUFA 20:4 (arasidonik asit) | 0 g | — | — |
| Retinol | 0 µg | — | — |
| Sakkaroz | 1.4 g | — | — |
| Selenyum | 18.7 µg | 13.1 µg | -29.9% |
| Serin | 1.15 g | — | — |
| SFA 10:0 | 0 g | — | — |
| SFA 12:0 | 0 g | — | — |
| SFA 14:0 | 0.01 g | — | — |
| SFA 15:0 | 0 g | — | — |
| SFA 16:0 (palmitik asit) | 1.15 g | — | — |
| SFA 17:0 | 0 g | — | — |
| SFA 18:0 (stearik asit) | 0.22 g | — | — |
| SFA 20:0 | 0.05 g | — | — |
| SFA 22:0 | 0.02 g | — | — |
| SFA 8:0 | 0 g | — | — |
| Sistin | 0.19 g | — | — |
| Sodyum | 4 mg | 20.33 mg | +408.2% |
| Su | 11.29 g | 9.9 g | -12.3% |
| Tirozin | 0.33 g | — | — |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 1.46 g | — | — |
| Toplam Folat | 82 µg | — | — |
| Toplam Kolin | 69.8 mg | — | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 1.69 g | — | — |
| Toplam yağ | 7.02 g | 2.45 g | -65.1% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 2.78 g | — | — |
| Toplam Şeker | 1.69 g | — | — |
| Total dietary fiber (AOAC 2011.25) | — | 16.15 g | — |
| Treonin | 0.56 g | — | — |
| Triptofan | 0.18 g | — | — |
| Valin | 0.68 g | — | — |
| Yüksek molekül ağırlıklı diyet lifi | — | 13.83 g | — |
| Çinko | 2.87 mg | 2.14 mg | -25.4% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Edamame Tane, Çiğ and Arpa Unu.
Arpa Unu has less energy per 100 g (357.2 kcal versus 371 kcal).
For measured Niasin, Edamame Tane, Çiğ has 0.92 mg and Arpa Unu has 5.94 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Edamame Tane, Çiğ 41, Arpa Unu 20.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.