Edamame Tane, Çiğ vs Arpa Unu comparison

Edamame Tane, Çiğ vs Arpa Unu comparison | Besin Analiz

Nutrients (per 100 g)

Per 100g Analysis

Nutrients	Edamame Tane, Çiğ	Arpa Unu	Difference
A Vitamini (IU)	2 iu	0 iu	-100.0%
A Vitamini (RAE)	0 µg	0 µg	—
ALA (18:3 n-3)	0.04 g	0 g	-100.0%
Alanin	0.8 g	0 g	-100.0%
Alfa Karoten	0 µg	0 µg	—
Alfa tokotrienol	0 mg	0 mg	—
Arjinin	1.06 g	0 g	-100.0%
Aspartik asit	1.26 g	0 g	-100.0%
Azot	0 g	1.5 g	—
B1 Vitamini (Tiamin)	0.12 mg	0.23 mg	+91.7%
B12 Vitamini	0 µg	0 µg	—
B12 Vitamini (eklenmiş)	0 µg	0 µg	—
B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin)	0.2 mg	0.15 mg	-25.0%
B6 Vitamini	0.59 mg	0.2 mg	-66.1%
Bakir	0.53 mg	0.39 mg	-26.4%
Besin folati	82 µg	0 µg	-100.0%
Beta Karoten	1 µg	0 µg	-100.0%
Beta kriptoksantin	0 µg	0 µg	—
Beta tokoferol	0.96 mg	0 mg	-100.0%
Beta tokotrienol	0.48 mg	0 mg	-100.0%
Beta-glukan	0 g	4.2 g	—
Betain	67.6 mg	0 mg	-100.0%
Biyotin	0 µg	8.61 µg	—
C Vitamini (askorbik asit)	4.2 mg	0 mg	-100.0%
D Vitamini	0 µg	0 µg	—
D Vitamini (IU)	0 iu	0 iu	—
Delta tokoferol	0.69 mg	0 mg	-100.0%
Delta tokotrienol	0 mg	0 mg	—
Demir	7.61 mg	3.3 mg	-56.6%
Diyet lifi	6.7 g	12.79 g	+90.9%
Düşük molekül ağırlıklı diyet lifi	0 g	2.31 g	—
E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol)	1.19 mg	0 mg	-100.0%
Enerji	371 kj	0 kj	-100.0%
Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri)	0 kcal	366.53 kcal	—
Enerji (Atwater Özel Faktörleri)	0 kcal	357.19 kcal	—
Etil alkol	0 g	0 g	—
Fenilalanin	0.54 g	0 g	-100.0%
Fitosteroller	24 mg	0 mg	-100.0%
Folat DFE	82 µg	0 µg	-100.0%
Folik asit	0 µg	0 µg	—
Fosfor	557 mg	234.4 mg	-57.9%
Fruktoz	0.01 g	0 g	-100.0%
Galaktoz	0 g	0 g	—
Gama tokoferol	0.19 mg	0 mg	-100.0%
Gama tokotrienol	0.29 mg	0 mg	-100.0%
Glikoz	0.27 g	0 g	-100.0%
Glisin	1.64 g	0 g	-100.0%
Glutamik asit	2.26 g	0 g	-100.0%
Histidin	0.39 g	0 g	-100.0%
Izolosin	0.58 g	0 g	-100.0%
K Vitamini (dihidrofilokinon)	0 µg	0 µg	—
K Vitamini (filokinon)	0 µg	0 µg	—
K Vitamini (menakinon-4)	0 µg	0 µg	—
Kalsiyum	159 mg	35.56 mg	-77.6%
Karbonhidrat (farkla)	65.25 g	77.4 g	+18.6%
Kolesterol	0 mg	0 mg	—
Kül	2.88 g	1.53 g	-46.9%
Laktoz	0 g	0 g	—
Likopen	0 µg	0 µg	—
Lizin	0.75 g	0 g	-100.0%
Losin	0.88 g	0 g	-100.0%
Lutein + zeaksantin	28 µg	0 µg	-100.0%
Magnezyum	248 mg	88.04 mg	-64.5%
Maltoz	0.01 g	0 g	-100.0%
Mangan	3.33 mg	1.18 mg	-64.6%
Metiyonin	0.23 g	0 g	-100.0%
Molibden	0 µg	57.36 µg	—
MUFA 14:1	0 g	0 g	—
MUFA 15:1	0 g	0 g	—
MUFA 16:1	0 g	0 g	—
MUFA 17:1	0 g	0 g	—
MUFA 18:1 (oleik asit)	1.67 g	0 g	-100.0%
MUFA 20:1	0.01 g	0 g	-100.0%
Niasin	0.92 mg	5.94 mg	+545.7%
Nisasta	57.27 g	56.86 g	-0.7%
Pantotenik asit	1.46 mg	0 mg	-100.0%
Potasyum	508 mg	366.6 mg	-27.8%
Prolin	0.7 g	0 g	-100.0%
Protein	13.56 g	8.72 g	-35.7%
PUFA 18:2 (linoleik asit)	2.74 g	0 g	-100.0%
PUFA 18:3	0.04 g	0 g	-100.0%
PUFA 18:3 n-6	0 g	0 g	—
PUFA 20:2 n-6	0 g	0 g	—
PUFA 20:3	0 g	0 g	—
PUFA 20:4 (arasidonik asit)	0 g	0 g	—
Retinol	0 µg	0 µg	—
Sakkaroz	1.4 g	0 g	-100.0%
Selenyum	18.7 µg	13.1 µg	-29.9%
Serin	1.15 g	0 g	-100.0%
SFA 10:0	0 g	0 g	—
SFA 12:0	0 g	0 g	—
SFA 14:0	0.01 g	0 g	-100.0%
SFA 15:0	0 g	0 g	—
SFA 16:0 (palmitik asit)	1.15 g	0 g	-100.0%
SFA 17:0	0 g	0 g	—
SFA 18:0 (stearik asit)	0.22 g	0 g	-100.0%
SFA 20:0	0.05 g	0 g	-100.0%
SFA 22:0	0.02 g	0 g	-100.0%
SFA 8:0	0 g	0 g	—
Sistin	0.19 g	0 g	-100.0%
Sodyum	4 mg	20.33 mg	+408.2%
Su	11.29 g	9.9 g	-12.3%
Tirozin	0.33 g	0 g	-100.0%
Toplam doymus yağ asitleri	1.46 g	0 g	-100.0%
Toplam Folat	82 µg	0 µg	-100.0%
Toplam Kolin	69.8 mg	0 mg	-100.0%
Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri	1.69 g	0 g	-100.0%
Toplam yağ	7.02 g	2.45 g	-65.1%
Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri	2.78 g	0 g	-100.0%
Toplam Şeker	1.69 g	0 g	-100.0%
Total dietary fiber (AOAC 2011.25)	0 g	16.15 g	—
Treonin	0.56 g	0 g	-100.0%
Triptofan	0.18 g	0 g	-100.0%
Valin	0.68 g	0 g	-100.0%
Yüksek molekül ağırlıklı diyet lifi	0 g	13.83 g	—
Çinko	2.87 mg	2.14 mg	-25.4%

Comparison Analysis: FAQ

Scientific answers to key differences between Edamame Tane, Çiğ and Arpa Unu.

This comparison summarizes the key differences between Edamame Tane, Çiğ and Arpa Unu in terms of energy (kcal), nutrition quality score and micronutrient balance. Arpa Unu tends to have a relatively higher energy value, and both are at a similar level in terms of overall nutrition score. Cards and charts on this page help you visually see in which context each food makes more sense.

Per 100 g, Arpa Unu provides fewer calories than the other option. If you are focusing on calorie control, keeping portions equal, Arpa Unu will usually fit more easily into your daily limits.

If keeping total daily calories low is your main goal, you can prioritize the lower-calorie option as your default and use the other one in smaller portions. Over the long term, rotating between similar foods is usually a good way to keep both taste and nutrient variety high.

According to the nutrient comparison: Niasin: Arpa Unu leads significantly; Sodyum: Arpa Unu leads significantly; A Vitamini (IU): Edamame Tane, Çiğ leads significantly. The "Nutrients (per 100 g)" table on this page shows in detail which food leads in each nutrient. The one with higher protein may be more advantageous for muscle repair and satiety goals.

In terms of calories, Arpa Unu provides fewer calories per portion, so you consume less energy for the same serving size. This is usually an advantage when aiming for weight loss. Consuming both in balanced portions, with the lower-calorie one slightly more often, is a sensible approach.

In terms of protein, Edamame Tane, Çiğ stands out. Since protein intake is important for muscle repair and recovery, Edamame Tane, Çiğ may be a better choice for post-workout meals. Also, the food with higher carbohydrates can help replenish muscle glycogen stores. Check the protein and carbohydrate values in the nutrient comparison on this page to decide.

Edamame Tane, Çiğ vs Arpa Unu