Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
358 kcal
Score
3 / 100
Amarant unu has a higher nutrition quality score (38) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
386 vs 358(-7.2%)
Score Diff
38 vs 3(-92.1%)
OVERALL WINNER
Amarant unu
Higher energy
Amarant unu
Score leader
Amarant unu
Nutrient split
13 - 2 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Amarant unu and Tapyoka nişastası are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Amarant unu has 386.0 kcal and Tapyoka nişastası has 358.0 kcal. The difference is 28.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 38 and 3. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
15 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Amarant unu | Tapyoka nişastası | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.116 mg | — | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.2 mg | — | — |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.587 mg | — | — |
| Bakir | 0.525 mg | 0.02 mg | -96.2% |
| Demir | 7.61 mg | 1.58 mg | -79.2% |
| Dirençli nişasta | — | 1.2 g | — |
| Diyet lifi | 6.7 g | 0.9 g | -86.6% |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | — | 358 kcal | — |
| Folat DFE | 49 µg | — | — |
| Fosfor | 557 mg | 7 mg | -98.7% |
| Kalsiyum | 159 mg | 20 mg | -87.4% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 66.17 g | 87.79 g | +32.7% |
| Kül | 2.48 g | 0.1 g | -96.0% |
| Magnezyum | 248 mg | 1 mg | -99.6% |
| Mangan | 3.33 mg | 0.11 mg | -96.7% |
| Niasin | 0.923 mg | — | — |
| Potasyum | 508 mg | 11 mg | -97.8% |
| Protein | 14.45 g | 0.19 g | -98.7% |
| Selenyum | — | 0.8 µg | — |
| Sodyum | 21 mg | 1 mg | -95.2% |
| Su | 11.1 g | 11.99 g | +8.0% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 1.46 g | — | — |
| Toplam Folat | — | 4 µg | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 1.69 g | — | — |
| Toplam yağ | 6.51 g | 0.02 g | -99.7% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 2.78 g | — | — |
| Toplam Şeker | 1.7 g | — | — |
| Çinko | 2.87 mg | 0.12 mg | -95.8% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Amarant unu and Tapyoka nişastası.
Tapyoka nişastası has less energy per 100 g (358 kcal versus 386 kcal).
For measured Toplam yağ, Amarant unu has 6.51 g and Tapyoka nişastası has 0.02 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Amarant unu 38, Tapyoka nişastası 3.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.