Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
342 kcal
Score
24 / 100
Amarant unu has a higher nutrition quality score (38) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
386 vs 342(-11.4%)
Score Diff
38 vs 24(-36.8%)
OVERALL WINNER
Amarant unu
Higher energy
Amarant unu
Score leader
Amarant unu
Nutrient split
19 - 4 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Amarant unu and Pilavlık Bulgur are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Amarant unu has 386.0 kcal and Pilavlık Bulgur has 342.0 kcal. The difference is 44.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 38 and 24. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
23 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Amarant unu | Pilavlık Bulgur | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.116 mg | 0.232 mg | +100.0% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.2 mg | 0.115 mg | -42.5% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.587 mg | 0.342 mg | -41.7% |
| Bakir | 0.525 mg | 0.335 mg | -36.2% |
| Demir | 7.61 mg | 2.46 mg | -67.7% |
| Diyet lifi | 6.7 g | 18.3 g | +173.1% |
| Folat DFE | 49 µg | — | — |
| Fosfor | 557 mg | 300 mg | -46.1% |
| Kalsiyum | 159 mg | 35 mg | -78.0% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 66.17 g | 75.87 g | +14.7% |
| Kül | 2.48 g | 1.51 g | -39.1% |
| Magnezyum | 248 mg | 164 mg | -33.9% |
| Mangan | 3.33 mg | 3.048 mg | -8.5% |
| Niasin | 0.923 mg | 5.114 mg | +454.1% |
| Potasyum | 508 mg | 410 mg | -19.3% |
| Protein | 14.45 g | 12.29 g | -14.9% |
| Selenyum | — | 2.3 µg | — |
| Sodyum | 21 mg | 17 mg | -19.0% |
| Su | 11.1 g | 9 g | -18.9% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 1.46 g | 0.232 g | -84.1% |
| Toplam Folat | — | 27 µg | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 1.69 g | 0.179 g | -89.4% |
| Toplam yağ | 6.51 g | 1.33 g | -79.6% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 2.78 g | 0.548 g | -80.3% |
| Toplam Şeker | 1.7 g | 0.41 g | -75.9% |
| Çinko | 2.87 mg | 1.93 mg | -32.8% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Amarant unu and Pilavlık Bulgur.
Pilavlık Bulgur has less energy per 100 g (342 kcal versus 386 kcal).
For measured Niasin, Amarant unu has 0.923 mg and Pilavlık Bulgur has 5.114 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Amarant unu 38, Pilavlık Bulgur 24.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.