Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
354 kcal
Score
16 / 100
Amarant Tohumu has a higher nutrition quality score (41) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
371 vs 354(-4.6%)
Score Diff
41 vs 16(-61.0%)
OVERALL WINNER
Amarant Tohumu
Higher energy
Amarant Tohumu
Score leader
Amarant Tohumu
Nutrient split
14 - 5 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Amarant Tohumu and Çeltik Pirinci are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Amarant Tohumu has 371.0 kcal and Çeltik Pirinci has 354.0 kcal. The difference is 17.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 41 and 16. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
19 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Amarant Tohumu | Çeltik Pirinci | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.12 mg | 0.4 mg | +233.3% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.2 mg | 0.05 mg | -75.0% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.59 mg | 0.35 mg | -40.7% |
| Bakir | 0.53 mg | — | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 4.2 mg | — | — |
| Demir | 7.61 mg | 1.8 mg | -76.3% |
| Diyet lifi | 6.7 g | 3.4 g | -49.3% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 1.19 mg | 0.7 mg | -41.2% |
| Folat DFE | 82 µg | — | — |
| Fosfor | 557 mg | 220 mg | -60.5% |
| Kalsiyum | 159 mg | 23 mg | -85.5% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 65.25 g | 76.2 g | +16.8% |
| Kül | 2.88 g | 1.2 g | -58.3% |
| Lizin | 0.75 g | — | — |
| Magnezyum | 248 mg | 110 mg | -55.6% |
| Mangan | 3.33 mg | 2 mg | -39.9% |
| Niasin | 0.92 mg | 4.5 mg | +389.1% |
| Pantotenik asit | 1.46 mg | — | — |
| Potasyum | 508 mg | 210 mg | -58.7% |
| Protein | 13.56 g | 7.5 g | -44.7% |
| Selenyum | 18.7 µg | — | — |
| Sodyum | 4 mg | 6 mg | +50.0% |
| Su | 11.29 g | 12.2 g | +8.1% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 1.46 g | — | — |
| Toplam Folat | — | 20 µg | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 1.69 g | — | — |
| Toplam yağ | 7.02 g | 2.2 g | -68.7% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 2.78 g | — | — |
| Toplam Şeker | 1.69 g | — | — |
| Çinko | 2.87 mg | 1.4 mg | -51.2% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Amarant Tohumu and Çeltik Pirinci.
Çeltik Pirinci has less energy per 100 g (354 kcal versus 371 kcal).
For measured Niasin, Amarant Tohumu has 0.92 mg and Çeltik Pirinci has 4.5 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Amarant Tohumu 41, Çeltik Pirinci 16.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.