Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
139 kcal
Score
33 / 100
Amarant Tohumu has a higher nutrition quality score (41) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
371 vs 139(-62.5%)
Score Diff
41 vs 33(-19.5%)
OVERALL WINNER
Amarant Tohumu
Higher energy
Amarant Tohumu
Score leader
Amarant Tohumu
Nutrient split
19 - 3 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Amarant Tohumu and Barbunya are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Amarant Tohumu has 371.0 kcal and Barbunya has 139.0 kcal. The difference is 232.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 41 and 33. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
22 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Amarant Tohumu | Barbunya | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.12 mg | 0.16 mg | +33.3% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.2 mg | 0.06 mg | -70.0% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.59 mg | 0.14 mg | -76.3% |
| Bakir | 0.53 mg | 0.24 mg | -54.7% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 4.2 mg | 1.2 mg | -71.4% |
| Demir | 7.61 mg | 2.1 mg | -72.4% |
| Diyet lifi | 6.7 g | 8.6 g | +28.4% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 1.19 mg | — | — |
| Folat DFE | 82 µg | — | — |
| Fosfor | 557 mg | 142 mg | -74.5% |
| Kalsiyum | 159 mg | 46 mg | -71.1% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 65.25 g | 24.8 g | -62.0% |
| Kül | 2.88 g | — | — |
| Lizin | 0.75 g | — | — |
| Magnezyum | 248 mg | 51 mg | -79.4% |
| Mangan | 3.33 mg | 0.46 mg | -86.2% |
| Niasin | 0.92 mg | 0.58 mg | -37.0% |
| Pantotenik asit | 1.46 mg | — | — |
| Potasyum | 508 mg | 395 mg | -22.2% |
| Protein | 13.56 g | 9.3 g | -31.4% |
| Selenyum | 18.7 µg | 1.2 µg | -93.6% |
| Sodyum | 4 mg | 2 mg | -50.0% |
| Su | 11.29 g | 63.5 g | +462.4% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 1.46 g | 0.12 g | -91.8% |
| Toplam Folat | — | 132 µg | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 1.69 g | — | — |
| Toplam yağ | 7.02 g | 0.65 g | -90.7% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 2.78 g | — | — |
| Toplam Şeker | 1.69 g | 0.6 g | -64.5% |
| Çinko | 2.87 mg | 1.15 mg | -59.9% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Amarant Tohumu and Barbunya.
Barbunya has less energy per 100 g (139 kcal versus 371 kcal).
For measured Su, Amarant Tohumu has 11.29 g and Barbunya has 63.5 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Amarant Tohumu 41, Barbunya 33.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.