Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
574 kcal
Score
46 / 100
Altın Susam and Kabak Çekirdeği (Nevşehir) have the same nutrition score (46).
Energy Diff
573 vs 574(+0.2%)
Score Diff
46 vs 46(0.0%)
Higher energy
Kabak Çekirdeği (Nevşehir)
Score leader
Score is equal
Nutrient split
12 - 10 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Altın Susam and Kabak Çekirdeği (Nevşehir) are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Altın Susam has 573.0 kcal and Kabak Çekirdeği (Nevşehir) has 574.0 kcal. The difference is 1.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 46 and 46. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
22 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Altın Susam | Kabak Çekirdeği (Nevşehir) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.79 mg | 0.273 mg | -65.4% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.25 mg | 0.153 mg | -38.8% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.79 mg | 0.211 mg | -73.3% |
| Bakir | 4.08 mg | 1.34 mg | -67.2% |
| Demir | 14.55 mg | 8.82 mg | -39.4% |
| Diyet lifi | 11.8 g | 6 g | -49.2% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | — | 2.22 mg | — |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | — | 574 kcal | — |
| Folat DFE | — | 58 µg | — |
| Fosfor | 629 mg | 1233 mg | +96.0% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | — | 7.3 µg | — |
| Kalsiyum | 975 mg | 46 mg | -95.3% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 23.45 g | 20.21 g | -13.8% |
| Kolesterol | — | 0 mg | — |
| Kül | 4.46 g | 4.97 g | +11.4% |
| Magnezyum | 351 mg | 592 mg | +68.7% |
| Mangan | 2.46 mg | 4.54 mg | +84.6% |
| Niasin | 4.52 mg | 4.938 mg | +9.2% |
| Potasyum | 468 mg | 809 mg | +72.9% |
| Protein | 17.73 g | 24.54 g | +38.4% |
| Selenyum | — | 9.3 µg | — |
| Sodyum | 11 mg | 7 mg | -36.4% |
| Su | 4.69 g | 5.23 g | +11.5% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 6.96 g | 8.52 g | +22.4% |
| Toplam Folat | 97 µg | — | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 18.76 g | 16.21 g | -13.6% |
| Toplam yağ | 49.67 g | 49.05 g | -1.2% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 21.77 g | 21.01 g | -3.5% |
| Toplam Şeker | — | 1.4 g | — |
| Çinko | 7.75 mg | 7.81 mg | +0.8% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Altın Susam and Kabak Çekirdeği (Nevşehir).
Altın Susam has less energy per 100 g (573 kcal versus 574 kcal).
For measured Fosfor, Altın Susam has 629 mg and Kabak Çekirdeği (Nevşehir) has 1233 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Altın Susam 46, Kabak Çekirdeği (Nevşehir) 46.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.