Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
418 kcal
Score
29 / 100
Altın Susam has a higher nutrition quality score (46) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
573 vs 418(-27.1%)
Score Diff
46 vs 29(-37.0%)
OVERALL WINNER
Altın Susam
Higher energy
Altın Susam
Score leader
Altın Susam
Nutrient split
17 - 5 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Altın Susam and Akçaağaç tohumu are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Altın Susam has 573.0 kcal and Akçaağaç tohumu has 418.0 kcal. The difference is 155.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 46 and 29. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
22 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Altın Susam | Akçaağaç tohumu | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.79 mg | 0.35 mg | -55.7% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.25 mg | 0.18 mg | -28.0% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.79 mg | 0.42 mg | -46.8% |
| Bakir | 4.08 mg | 0.85 mg | -79.2% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | — | 2.4 mg | — |
| Demir | 14.55 mg | 4.8 mg | -67.0% |
| Diyet lifi | 11.8 g | 11.5 g | -2.5% |
| Folat DFE | — | 62 µg | — |
| Fosfor | 629 mg | 390 mg | -38.0% |
| Kalsiyum | 975 mg | 145 mg | -85.1% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 23.45 g | 38.6 g | +64.6% |
| Kül | 4.46 g | 3.7 g | -17.0% |
| Magnezyum | 351 mg | 180 mg | -48.7% |
| Mangan | 2.46 mg | 2.6 mg | +5.7% |
| Niasin | 4.52 mg | 2.1 mg | -53.5% |
| Potasyum | 468 mg | 650 mg | +38.9% |
| Protein | 17.73 g | 22.4 g | +26.3% |
| Sodyum | 11 mg | 9 mg | -18.2% |
| Su | 4.69 g | 18.5 g | +294.5% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 6.96 g | 2.1 g | -69.8% |
| Toplam Folat | 97 µg | — | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 18.76 g | 6.5 g | -65.4% |
| Toplam yağ | 49.67 g | 16.8 g | -66.2% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 21.77 g | 7.2 g | -66.9% |
| Toplam Şeker | — | 4.2 g | — |
| Çinko | 7.75 mg | 3.2 mg | -58.7% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Altın Susam and Akçaağaç tohumu.
Akçaağaç tohumu has less energy per 100 g (418 kcal versus 573 kcal).
For measured Su, Altın Susam has 4.69 g and Akçaağaç tohumu has 18.5 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Altın Susam 46, Akçaağaç tohumu 29.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.